Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Among Female Medicare Beneficiaries: The Role of Apical Support
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been attributed to many factors, one of which is lack of vaginal apical support. To assess the role of vaginal apical support and POP, we analyzed a national dataset to compare long-term reoperation rates after prolapse surgery performed with and without apical support. METHODS: Public use file data on a 5% random national sample of female Medicare beneficiaries were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Women with POP who underwent surgery during 1999 were identified by relevant International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, and Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition codes. Individual patients were followed-up through 2009. Prolapse repair was categorized as anterior, posterior, or anterior-posterior with or without a concomitant apical suspension procedure. The primary outcome was the rate of retreatment for POP. RESULTS: In 1999, 21,245 women had a diagnosis of POP. Of these, 3,244 (15.3%) underwent prolapse surgery that year. There were 2,756 women who underwent an anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, or both with or without apical suspension. After 10 years, cumulative reoperation rates were highest among women who had an isolated anterior repair (20.2%) and significantly exceeded reoperation rates among women who had a concomitant apical support procedure (11.6%; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Ten years after surgery for POP, the reoperation rate was significantly reduced when a concomitant apical suspension procedure was performed. This analysis of a national cohort suggests that the appropriate use of a vaginal apical support procedure at the time of surgical treatment of POP might reduce the long-term risk of prolapse recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors previously found to influence recurrence include age <60 years, postmenopausal status, advanced stages of POP (III-IV), history of complicated delivery, urinary incontinence before POP surgery, widened genital hiatus, high BMI, and failure to perform apical suspension.
“Several factors have been found to influence recurrence of POP; among them, age < 60 years, postmenopausal status, advanced stages of POP (III–IV), history of complicated delivery, urinary incontinence before POP surgery, widened genital hiatus, high body mass index (BMI), and failure to perform apical suspension [12, 13, 16, 17].”
From Risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery among Ugandan women: a prospective cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [17]
The Results report higher reoperation rates when anterior or combined anterior–posterior repair was performed without apical support, supporting the apical-suspension factor. The paper does not establish the other listed factors; its Discussion says prolapse severity could not be assessed, and its cohort was aged 65–96, so it could not evaluate age under 60. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe absence of apical support doubles the risk of POP recurrence, and performing McCall-type culdoplasty or high uterosacral ligament suspension during any type of hysterectomy may reduce the risk of apical prolapse.
“According to Eilber et al. [ 25 ] the absence of apical support doubles the risk of POP recurrence and performing McCall-type culdoplasty or high uterosacral ligament suspension during any type of hysterectomy, may reduce the risk of apical prolapse [ 26 – 28 ].”
From Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence
OLSEN, A., SMITH, V, BERGSTROM, J., COLLING, J., & CLARK, A. (1997) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00058-6 · Cited by 3,335 · see citing works
Pelvic organ prolapse in the women's health initiative: Gravity and gravidity
Hendrix, S. L., Clark, A., Nygaard, I., Aragaki, A. K., Barnabei, V. M., & McTiernan, A. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.123819 · Cited by 1,273 · see citing works
Anatomie aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy
DeLancey, J. O. L. (1992) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(92)91562-o · Cited by 999 · see citing works
The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: Current observations and future projections
Luber, K. M., Boero, S., & Choe, J. Y. (2001) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2001.114868 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse
Rooney, K., Kenton, K., Mueller, E. R., FitzGerald, M. P., & Brubaker, L. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.065 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support
Summers, A., Winkel, L. A., Hussain, H. K., & DeLancey, J. O. L. (2006) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.057 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Daneshgari, F. (2009) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.055 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The Role of Apical Vaginal Support in the Appearance of Anterior and Posterior Vaginal Prolapse
Lowder, J. L., Park, A. J., Ellison, R., Ghetti, C. C., Moalli, P., Zyczynski, H. M., & Weber, A. M. (2008) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000297309.25091.a0 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Handel, L. N., Frenkl, T. L., & Kim, Y. H. (2007) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.041 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Patterns of Pessary Care and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Alperin, M., Khan, A. A., Dubina, E. D., Tarnay, C. M., Wu, N., Pashos, C. L., & Anger, J. T. (2013) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0b013e31827e857c · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Predictive Value of a Cystocele for Concomitant Vaginal Apical Prolapse
Elliott, C. S., Yeh, J., Comiter, C. V., et al. (2012) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.177 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A comparison of women with primary and recurrent pelvic prolapse
Kenton, K. S., Sadowski, D. L., Shott, S., & Brubaker, L. T. (1999) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70027-x · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406 · see citing works
Pelvic Organ Prolapse: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 214
(2019) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000003519 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Genital hiatus size is associated with and predictive of apical vaginal support loss
Lowder, J. L., Oliphant, S. S., Shepherd, J. P., Ghetti, C., & Sutkin, G. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.027 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Haj-Yahya, R., Chill, H. H., Levin, G., Reuveni-Salzman, A., & Shveiky, D. (2020) · Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.012 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Surgical Management for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Its Impact on Sexual Function
Thompson, J. C., & Rogers, R. G. (2016) · Sexual Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.02.002 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension
Sutkin, G., Zyczynski, H. M., Sridhar, A., Jelovsek, J. E., Rardin, C. R., Mazloomdoost, D., Rahn, D. D., Nguyen, J. N., Andy, U. U., Meyer, I., et al. (2020) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women
Kim, T. Y., & Jeon, M. J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228566 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Kayondo, M., Geissbüehler, V., Migisha, R., Kajabwangu, R., Njagi, J., Kato, P. K., Fajardo, Y., Lugobe, H. M., & Kaye, D. K. (2022) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04930-8 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study
Kuittinen, T., Mentula, M., Tulokas, S., Brummer, T., Jalkanen, J., Tomas, E., Mäkinen, J., Sjöberg, J., Härkki, P., & Rahkola-Soisalo, P. (2024) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07615-x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Maher, C. (2021) · Pelvic Floor Disorders · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40862-6_55 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ruffolo, A. F., Lallemant, M., Barrieux, A., Rubod, C., & Cosson, M. (2025) · Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction · doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102975 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eilber, K. S., Alperin, M., Khan, A., Wu, N., Pashos, C. L., Clemens, J. Q., & Anger, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 981-987
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3857933
- OpenAlex
- W1977885454
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK080227)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001259)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
- Keywords
- pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, reoperation rate, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, vaginal prolapse surgery, long-term surgical outcomes, Medicare beneficiaries
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Humans, Recurrence, Reoperation, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, United States, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review