Cited by 177Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsHernia repair and management

Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Surgery Among Female Medicare Beneficiaries: The Role of Apical Support

Open access
Eilber, Karyn S., Alperin, Marianna, Khan, Aqsa, Wu, Ning, Pashos, Chris L., Clemens, J. Quentin, Anger, Jennifer T.·2013·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has been attributed to many factors, one of which is lack of vaginal apical support. To assess the role of vaginal apical support and POP, we analyzed a national dataset to compare long-term reoperation rates after prolapse surgery performed with and without apical support. METHODS: Public use file data on a 5% random national sample of female Medicare beneficiaries were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Women with POP who underwent surgery during 1999 were identified by relevant International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification, and Current Procedural Terminology, Fourth Edition codes. Individual patients were followed-up through 2009. Prolapse repair was categorized as anterior, posterior, or anterior-posterior with or without a concomitant apical suspension procedure. The primary outcome was the rate of retreatment for POP. RESULTS: In 1999, 21,245 women had a diagnosis of POP. Of these, 3,244 (15.3%) underwent prolapse surgery that year. There were 2,756 women who underwent an anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, or both with or without apical suspension. After 10 years, cumulative reoperation rates were highest among women who had an isolated anterior repair (20.2%) and significantly exceeded reoperation rates among women who had a concomitant apical support procedure (11.6%; P<.01). CONCLUSION: Ten years after surgery for POP, the reoperation rate was significantly reduced when a concomitant apical suspension procedure was performed. This analysis of a national cohort suggests that the appropriate use of a vaginal apical support procedure at the time of surgical treatment of POP might reduce the long-term risk of prolapse recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182a8a5e4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors previously found to influence recurrence include age <60 years, postmenopausal status, advanced stages of POP (III-IV), history of complicated delivery, urinary incontinence before POP surgery, widened genital hiatus, high BMI, and failure to perform apical suspension.

    “Several factors have been found to influence recurrence of POP; among them, age < 60 years, postmenopausal status, advanced stages of POP (III–IV), history of complicated delivery, urinary incontinence before POP surgery, widened genital hiatus, high body mass index (BMI), and failure to perform apical suspension [12, 13, 16, 17].”

    From Risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery among Ugandan women: a prospective cohort study (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results report higher reoperation rates when anterior or combined anterior–posterior repair was performed without apical support, supporting the apical-suspension factor. The paper does not establish the other listed factors; its Discussion says prolapse severity could not be assessed, and its cohort was aged 65–96, so it could not evaluate age under 60. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The absence of apical support doubles the risk of POP recurrence, and performing McCall-type culdoplasty or high uterosacral ligament suspension during any type of hysterectomy may reduce the risk of apical prolapse.

    “According to Eilber et al. [ 25 ] the absence of apical support doubles the risk of POP recurrence and performing McCall-type culdoplasty or high uterosacral ligament suspension during any type of hysterectomy, may reduce the risk of apical prolapse [ 26 – 28 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eilber, K. S., Alperin, M., Khan, A., Wu, N., Pashos, C. L., Clemens, J. Q., & Anger, J. T.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-11
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
981-987
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977885454
Cited by
177
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK080227)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD001259)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, prolapse recurrence, reoperation rate, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, vaginal prolapse surgery, long-term surgical outcomes, Medicare beneficiaries
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Medicare, Humans, Recurrence, Reoperation, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, United States, Uterine Prolapse, Vagina, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review