Cited by 67Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePregnancy and Medication Impact

Treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Open access
Ohno, Mika S., Sparks, Teresa N., Cheng, Yvonne W., Caughey, Aaron B.·2011·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of treating mild gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Study design A decision analytic model was built to compare treating vs not treating mild GDM. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). All probabilities, costs, and benefits were derived from the literature. Base case, sensitivity analyses, and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed.Results Treating mild GDM was more expensive, more effective, and cost-effective at $20,412 per QALY. Treatment remained cost-effective when the incremental cost to treat GDM was less than $3555 or if treatment met at least 49% of its reported efficacy at the baseline cost to treat of $1786.Conclusion Treating mild GDM is cost-effective in terms of improving maternal and neonatal outcomes including decreased rates of preeclampsia, cesarean sections, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, permanent and transient brachial plexus injury, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.051

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many researchers consider gestational diabetes mellitus treatment highly cost-effective when benefits of future maternal type 2 diabetes mellitus and childhood obesity risk reduction are considered.

    “However, many researchers consider GDM treatment highly cost-effective when the benefits of future maternal T2DM and childhood obesity risk reduction are taken into account32,42–45.”

    From A global view of hypertensive disorders and diabetes mellitus during pregnancy (2022) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Results report that treating mild GDM was cost-effective at $20,412 per QALY. But the Comment says the model could not include long-term effects on offspring, including possible obesity, and it does not report a reduction in future maternal type 2 diabetes. Its cost-effectiveness finding therefore was not based on taking those future benefits into account. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohno, M. S., Sparks, T. N., Cheng, Y. W., & Caughey, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
205
Issue
3
Pages
282.e1-282.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983757912
Cited by
67
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12 HD001262)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, preeclampsia, cesarean section, macrosomia, neonatal outcomes, maternal outcomes, brachial plexus injury, neonatal hypoglycemia, neonatal intensive care admission
MeSH terms
Adult, Cesarean Section, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Decision Support Techniques, Dystocia, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Severity of Illness Index, Diabetes, Gestational, Health Care Costs, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review