Cited by 415Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietSports and Physical Education Studies

Trend and Prevalence Estimates Based on the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

Carlson, Susan A., Fulton, Janet E., Schoenborn, Charlotte A., Loustalot, Fleetwood·2010·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background According to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, adults need to engage in at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity activity or its equivalent (defined as aerobically active) to obtain substantial health benefits and more than 300 minutes/week (defined as highly active) to obtain more extensive health benefits. In addition to aerobic activity, the 2008 Guidelines recommend that adults participate in muscle-strengthening activities on 2 or more days/week.Purpose This study examined the prevalence and trends of meeting the activity criteria defined by the 2008 Guidelines among U.S. adults.Methods Prevalence and trends of participation in leisure-time physical activity were estimated from the 1998-2008 National Health Interview Survey (analyzed in 2010).Results In 2008, 43.5% of U.S. adults were aerobically active, 28.4% were highly active, 21.9% met the muscle-strengthening guideline, and 18.2% both met the muscle-strengthening guideline and were aerobically active. The likelihood of meeting each of these four activity criteria was similar and were associated with being male, being younger, being non-Hispanic white, having higher levels of education, and having a lower BMI. Trends over time were also similar for each part of the 2008 Guidelines, with the prevalence of participation exhibiting a small but significant increase when comparing 1998 to 2008 (difference ranging from 2.4 to 4.2 percentage points).Conclusions Little progress has been made during the past 10 years in increasing physical activity levels in the U.S. There is much room for improvement in achieving recommended levels of physical activity among Americans, particularly among relatively inactive subgroups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.006

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to 2006 MEPS and 2006 BRFSS data, annual medical expenditures would be 6.7% to 10.7% lower in the absence of obesity.

    “annual medical expenditures would be 6.7% to 10.7% lower in the absence of obesity.54”
  • A meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies including 518,520 participants found that prehypertension was associated with incident stroke.

    “A meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies (including 518 520 participants) found prehypertension was associated with incident stroke.”
  • The association between prehypertension and stroke risk was particularly noted in nonelderly persons and in those with blood pressure values in the higher prehypertension range.

    “The risk was particularly noted in nonelderly persons and for those with BP values in the higher prehypertension range.54”
  • Analysis of CHS data found that lifestyle risk factors including physical activity level, dietary habits, smoking habits, alcohol use, and adiposity measures, assessed late in life, were each independently associated with risk of new-onset diabetes; participants whose physical activity and dietary, smoking, and alcohol habits were all in the low-risk group had an 82% lower incidence of diabetes,

    “Analysis of data from the CHS of the NHLBI found that lifestyle risk factors, including PA level, dietary habits, smoking habits, alcohol use, and adiposity measures, assessed late in life, were each independently associated with risk of new-onset DM. Participants whose PA level and dietary, smoking, and alcohol habits were all in the low-risk group had an 82% lower incidence of DM than all other”
  • When absence of adiposity was added to the other 4 low-risk lifestyle factors, incidence of diabetes was 89% lower.

    “When absence of adiposity was added to the other 4 low-risk lifestyle factors, incidence of DM was 89% lower.54”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Schoenborn, C. A., & Loustalot, F.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • National Center for Health Statistics (US)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Susan A.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
305-313
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978248025
Cited by
415
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 28
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Sports and Physical Education Studies
Keywords
physical activity, aerobic exercise, muscle-strengthening activity, leisure-time physical activity, physical activity prevalence, physical activity trends, adult physical activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Educational Status, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Sex Factors, United States, Exercise, Prevalence, Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review