Cited by 133Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceStalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The Longitudinal Impact of an Internet Safety Decision Aid for Abused Women

Open access
Glass, Nancy E., Perrin, Nancy A., Hanson, Ginger C., Bloom, Tina L., Messing, Jill T., Clough, Amber S., Campbell, Jacquelyn C., Gielen, Andrea C. +2 more·2017·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction Women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) navigate complex, dangerous decisions. Tailored safety information and safety planning, typically provided by domestic violence service providers, can prevent repeat IPV exposure and associated adverse health outcomes; however, few abused women access these services. The Internet represents a potentially innovative way to connect abused women with tailored safety planning resources and information. The purpose of this study was to compare safety and mental health outcomes at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months among abused women randomized to: (1) a tailored, Internet-based safety decision aid; or (2) control website (typical safety information available online).Design Multistate, community-based longitudinal RCT with one-to-one allocation ratio and blocked randomization. Data were collected March 2011-May 2013 and analyzed June-July 2015.Setting/participants Currently abused Spanish- or English-speaking women (N=720).Intervention A tailored Internet-based safety decision aid included priority-setting activities, risk assessment, and tailored feedback and safety plans. A control website offered typical safety information available online.Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were decisional conflict, safety behaviors, and repeat IPV; secondary outcomes included depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.Results At 12 months, there were no significant group differences in IPV, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder. Intervention women experienced significantly less decisional conflict after one use (β= -2.68, p=0.042) and greater increase in safety behaviors they rated as helpful from baseline to 12 months (12% vs 9%, p=0.033) and were more likely to have left the abuser (63% vs 53%, p=0.008). Women who left had higher baseline risk (14.9 vs 13.1, p=0.003) found more of the safety behaviors they tried helpful (61.1% vs 47.5%, p<0.001), and had greater reductions in psychological IPV ((11.69 vs 7.5, p=0.001) and sexual IPV (2.41 vs 1.25, p=0.001) than women who stayed.Conclusions Internet-based safety planning represents a promising tool to reduce the public health impact of IPV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.014

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The power analysis was based on baseline means and standard deviations for depression and PTSD from the IRIS trial.

    “The power analysis was based on baseline means and standard deviations for depression and PTSD from the IRIS trial [37].”

    From Longitudinal impacts of an online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction identifies this study as the Internet Resource for Intervention and Safety (IRIS) trial, and Methods > Measures confirms that it assessed depression and PTSD. The available passages do not give baseline means and standard deviations for those outcomes, so they do not verify the stated inputs to the citing authors’ power analysis (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Between-group differences were only found in the US-based IRIS study, where the tailored intervention was more effective than general online information in reducing decisional conflict after one use of the tool and in increasing the use of helpful safety actions over a 12-month period.

    “However, between-group differences were only found in the US-based IRIS study, where the tailored intervention was more effective than general online information in reducing decisional conflict after one use of the tool and in increasing the use of helpful safety actions over a 12-month period [37].”
  • In trials completed in the US (IRIS), NZ (I-SAFE) and Australia (I-DECIDE), women in both study arms improved over time on most primary and secondary outcomes.

    “In trials completed in the US (IRIS) [37], NZ (I-SAFE) [38] and Australia (I-DECIDE) [39], women in both study arms (tailored online intervention, general information) improved over time on most primary and secondary outcomes.”
  • The lack of differences by study arm is consistent with the overall pattern of results found in 3 completed trials that also tested versions of a tailored intervention with the same core components, modified to fit different countries and contexts, against a non-tailored intervention [25, 37-39].

    “The lack of differences by study arm is consistent with the overall pattern of results found in 3 completed trials that also tested versions of a tailored intervention with the same core components, modified to fit different countries and contexts, against a non-tailored intervention [25, 37–39].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Dutton MA. Empowering and healing battered women. 1993, New York: Springer.
  2. [26]Ghanbarpour SA. Understanding factors that influence the practice of safety strategies by victims of intimate partner violence [dissertation]. The Johns Hopkins University; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glass, N. E., Perrin, N. A., Hanson, G. C., Bloom, T. L., Messing, J. T., Clough, A. S., Campbell, J. C., Gielen, A. C., Case, J., & Eden, K. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Glass, Nancy E.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
606-615
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2577328310
Cited by
133
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085641)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
intimate partner violence, safety planning, decision aids, online intervention, battered women, decisional conflict, safety behavior, leaving abusive relationships, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological violence, sexual abuse, risk assessment, personalized feedback, Spanish-speaking women
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Adult, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Decision Support Techniques, Depression, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Safety, Spouse Abuse, United States, Domestic Violence, Risk Assessment, Battered Women, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review