Cited by 57Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Health and Mental HealthVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Effects of daily stress on autonomic cardiac control in patients with coronary artery disease

Bacon, Simon L, Watkins, Lana L, Babyak, Michael, Sherwood, Andrew, Hayano, Junichiro, Hinderliter, Alan L, Waugh, Robert, Blumenthal, James A·2004·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Emotional stress has been implicated in the development and progression of coronary artery disease, with 1 proposed causal pathway being changes in cardiac autonomic tone. One hundred thirty-five patients with coronary artery disease underwent 48 hours of ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and completed activity and mood diaries every 20 minutes while awake. Random-effects model analyses associated higher levels of negative emotions (e.g., anger, stress, sadness) with decreases in high- and low-frequency power, whereas higher levels of positive emotion were related to an increase in low-frequency power, independent of age, posture, and medications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.02.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive psychological factors, including the capacity to regulate emotions effectively, are associated with and plausibly mechanistically responsible for healthier basal levels of autonomic parameters such as heart rate and heart rate variability, greater vagal tone, and healthier biological stress responses.

    “Positive psychological factors, including the capacity to regulate emotions effectively, are associated with and plausibly mechanistically responsible for healthier basal levels of autonomic parameters such as heart rate and heart rate variability, greater vagal tone, and healthier biological stress responses. 126-131”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacon, S. L., Watkins, L. L., Babyak, M., Sherwood, A., Hayano, J., Hinderliter, A. L., Waugh, R., & Blumenthal, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Nagoya City University (JP)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Bacon, Simon L
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
93
Issue
10
Pages
1292-1294
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024104925
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL59672, R01HL059672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
emotional stress, coronary artery disease, cardiac autonomic control, heart rate variability, negative emotions, positive emotions, Holter monitoring, mood diary, autonomic tone
MeSH terms
Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Myocardial Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review