Cited by 263Stress Responses and CortisolPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Positive affect and psychobiological processes

Open access
Dockray, Samantha, Steptoe, Andrew·2010·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Positive affect has been associated with favourable health outcomes, and it is likely that several biological processes mediate the effects of positive mood on physical health. There is converging evidence that positive affect activates the neuroendocrine, autonomic and immune systems in distinct and functionally meaningful ways. Cortisol, both total output and the awakening response, has consistently been shown to be lower among individuals with higher levels of positive affect. The beneficial effects of positive mood on cardiovascular function, including heart rate and blood pressure, and the immune system have also been described. The influence of positive affect on these psychobiological processes is independent of negative affect, suggesting that positive affect may have characteristic biological correlates. The duration and conceptualisation of positive affect may be important considerations in understanding how different biological systems are activated in association with positive affect. The association of positive affect and psychobiological processes has been established, and these biological correlates may be partly responsible for the protective effects of positive affect on health outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.006

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive emotionality is a core element of mental health and shows beneficial, generalized effects on health and functioning.

    “positive emotionality is considered a core element of mental health, showing beneficial, generalized effects on health and functioning [34-37].”

    From Negative and positive affect regulation in a transdiagnostic internet-based protocol for emotional disorders: Randomized controlled trial (2021) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Introduction says positive affect is associated with better current and future health, and the “Positive affect and wellbeing” section treats positive feelings as part of wellbeing. The paper does not describe positive emotionality as a core element of mental health or establish generalized benefits for functioning; it also cautions that a causal link to health is difficult to establish. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Diener E Assessing Wellbeing: The Collected Works of Ed Diener 2009 New York, NY, USA Springer Science + Business Media; US
  2. Scollon CN Prieto C Diener E Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strength and Weaknesses Assessing Wellbeing 2009 3 New York, NY, USA Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dockray, S., & Steptoe, A.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dockray, Samantha
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
69-75
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005431044
Cited by
263
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (PG/03/029)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (EFH16042)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/F03511X/1)
  • National Institute on Aging (2R01AG13196, R37AG013196, R01AG013196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
positive affect, positive mood, cortisol, cortisol awakening response, cardiovascular function, heart rate, blood pressure, immune system, neuroendocrine system, autonomic nervous system, negative affect, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Affect, Animals, C-Reactive Protein, Circadian Rhythm, Fibrinogen, Health, Health Status, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Immune System, Stress, Psychological, Cytokines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review