Cited by 41Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Hemodynamic Mechanisms Underlying the Incomplete Tolerance to Caffeine's Pressor Effects

Farag, Noha H., Vincent, Andrea S., McKey, Barbara S., Whitsett, Thomas L., Lovallo, William R.·2005·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular hemodynamics were assessed at baseline and after caffeine administration in a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial of caffeine tolerance formation. Half of the subjects developed tolerance to the pressor effect of caffeine, whereas the other half continued to show increases in BP after caffeine ingestion (F = 16.7, p <0.0001). In the subjects who did not develop tolerance, peripheral resistance increased incrementally as the daily dose of caffeine increased (F = 2.8, p = 0.05).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.093

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some studies have shown that habitual consumption results in tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode and that tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.

    “Some studies have shown that habitual consumption results in a tolerance to the acute effects of caffeine, 18,19 while others have found that some individuals continue to experience these acute effects with each drinking episode 20,21 and that the tolerance disappears after 12 hours of abstinence.22”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farag, N. H., Vincent, A. S., McKey, B. S., Whitsett, T. L., & Lovallo, W. R.
Affiliations
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Corresponding author
Farag, Noha H.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
95
Issue
11
Pages
1389-1392
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084966747
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL32050, R01HL032050)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01 RR-14467, M01RR014467)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
caffeine, caffeine tolerance, pressor response, blood pressure, cardiovascular hemodynamics, systemic vascular resistance, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Drug Tolerance, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Vascular Resistance, Vasoconstrictor Agents, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review