Cited by 196Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 40 mg alone or in combination with ezetimibe in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (results from the EXPLORER study)

Open access
Ballantyne, Christie M., Weiss, Robert, Moccetti, Tiziano, Vogt, Anja, Eber, Bernd, Sosef, Froukje, Duffield, Emma·2007·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Patients at risk of coronary heart disease may not achieve recommended low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goals on statin monotherapy. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin 40 mg alone or in combination with ezetimibe 10 mg in patients at high risk of coronary heart disease. Four hundred sixty-nine patients were randomly assigned to rosuvastatin alone or in combination with ezetimibe for 6 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) LDL cholesterol goal (<100 mg/dl) at week 6. Secondary end points included the percentage of patients achieving other ATP III and 2003 European lipid goals, changes from baseline in lipid, lipoprotein, and inflammatory parameters, and safety and tolerability. Significantly more patients receiving rosuvastatin/ezetimibe than rosuvastatin alone achieved their ATP III LDL cholesterol goal (<100 mg/dl, 94.0% vs 79.1%, p <0.001) and the optional LDL cholesterol goal (<70 mg/dl) for very high-risk patients (79.6% vs 35.0%, p <0.001). The combination of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe reduced LDL cholesterol significantly more than rosuvastatin (-69.8% vs -57.1%, p <0.001). Other components of the lipid/lipoprotein profile were also significantly (p <0.001) improved with rosuvastatin/ezetimibe. Both treatments generally were well tolerated. Rosuvastatin 40 mg was effective at improving the atherogenic lipid profile in this high-risk population. Combination rosuvastatin with ezetimibe 10 mg enabled greater decreases in LDL cholesterol and allowed more patients to achieve LDL cholesterol goals. In conclusion, rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe may improve the management of high-risk patients who cannot achieve goal on maximal statin monotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.022

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Barter P, Gotto A, LaRosa J, Grundy S, Bittner V, Fruchart J-C, on behalf of the TNT Steering Committee and Investigators. On-treatment levels of HDL-C and the ratio of LDL-C/HDL-C as predictors of cardiovascular events in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) Study (abstr). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:298A.
  2. [21]Jones PH, Davidson MH, Stein EA, Bays HE, McKenney JM, Miller E, Cain VA, Blasetto JW; STELLAR Study Group. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin across doses (STELLAR* Trial). Am J Cardiol 2003; 92:152-160.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballantyne, C. M., Weiss, R., Moccetti, T., Vogt, A., Eber, B., Sosef, F., & Duffield, E.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino (CH)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Barmherzige Schwestern vom heiligen Kreuz (AT)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Ballantyne, Christie M.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
99
Issue
5
Pages
673-680
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985258577
Cited by
196
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
22.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, LDL cholesterol lowering, coronary artery disease, high cardiovascular risk, lipid-lowering therapy, lipoprotein profile, inflammatory markers, drug safety and tolerability
MeSH terms
Rosuvastatin Calcium, Ezetimibe, Aged, Azetidines, Cardiovascular Diseases, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Fluorobenzenes, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrimidines, Sulfonamides, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review