Cited by 24Congenital Heart Disease StudiesGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Clinical and echocardiographic prevalence and detection of congenital and acquired cardiac abnormalities in girls and women with the Turner syndrome

Yetman, Anji T., Starr, Lois, Sanmann, Jennifer, Wilde, Megan, Murray, Mary, Cramer, Jonathan W.·2018·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The prevalence of congenital and acquired heart disease in patients with the Turner syndrome (TS) is based on historic cohorts who underwent imaging before the advent of modern day echocardiography. Recent small studies suggest a higher prevalence of cardiac defects. We reviewed clinical and echocardiographic data on 564 girls and women with TS to assess the prevalence of cardiac defects. Echocardiographic review on a subset of this population was performed to assess for diagnostic limitations of echocardiography in assessing for congenital and acquired defects in this patient cohort. Bicuspid aortic valve was present in 39%, aortic coarctation in 21%, and some forms of structural cardiac anomaly in 56%. Failure to perform a complete congenital echocardiogram with suprasternal and high right or left parasternal windows was associated with failure to identify congenital and acquired cardiac defects. In conclusion, major cardiac defects are present in the majority of patients with TS. Echocardiographic technique can be optimized to avoid missing cardiac lesions of potential hemodynamic significance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.357

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TTE is valuable for the diagnosis and surveillance of CHD and aortic dilation, but may be limited by poor acoustic windows, especially in older children and adults.

    “TTE is valuable for the diagnosis and surveillance of CHD and aortic dilation,426-428 but may be limited by poor acoustic windows, especially in older children and adults.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yetman, A. T., Starr, L., Sanmann, J., Wilde, M., Murray, M., & Cramer, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Yetman, Anji T.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
327-330
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799849175
Cited by
24
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
Turner syndrome, congenital heart disease, acquired heart disease, bicuspid aortic valve, coarctation of the aorta, women and girls
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Echocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, United States, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review