Cited by 10Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

The QT interval in patients with the Turner syndrome

Harrahill, Noah J., Yetman, Anji T., Danford, David A., Starr, Lois J., Sanmann, Jennifer N., Robinson, Jeffrey A.·2021·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Patients with the Turner syndrome (TS) often have longer QT intervals compared with age-matched peers although the significance of this remains unknown. We sought to determine the degree, frequency and impact of QTc prolongation in patients with TS. A chart review of all patients with an electrocardiogram (ECG) and genetically proven TS was performed. Medications at the time of the ECG were reviewed and QTc calculated. Medications were classified according to QTc risk using www.crediblemeds.com. ECG parameters were compared with an age, gender, and cardiac lesion-matched control group. Over the 10-year period of review, 112 TS patients with a mean age of 34 ± 25 years underwent 226 ECGs. At least 1 QTc prolonging medication was prescribed in 81 (74%) patients. Longer QTc interval correlated with absence of y chromosomal material (p = 0.01), older age (p <0.0001), increased number of QTc prolonging and nonprolonging medications (p <0.0001 each). During the 7.0 ± 5.1 years of follow-up, no patient had ventricular arrhythmia or unexplained sudden death. QTc was significantly shorter in matched controls using either Bazett or Hodges formula (424 ± 16 ms vs 448 ± 28 ms, p <0.0001; and 414.8 ± 16 ms vs 424.2 ± 20 ms; p = 0.0002, respectively). However, there was no difference in the frequency of QTc prolongation >460 msec (2.8% vs 2.6%, p = 0.9). In conclusion, despite frequent use of QT-prolonging medications, ventricular arrhythmias are rare in TS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.061

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrahill, N. J., Yetman, A. T., Danford, D. A., Starr, L. J., Sanmann, J. N., & Robinson, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Creighton University (US)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Hospital & Medical Center (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Yetman, Anji T.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
140
Pages
118-121
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095538242
Cited by
10
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
Turner syndrome, QTc prolongation, QT interval, QT-prolonging medications, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, Bazett formula, Hodges formula, electrocardiogram
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Rate, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Turner Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review