Cited by 144Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health Studies

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nutritional Supplementation During Acute Illness

Open access
Gariballa, Salah, Forster, Sarah, Walters, Stephen, Powers, Hilary·2006·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose The study tested whether nutritional support of older patients during acute illness leads to a clinical benefit. Methods In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned 445 hospitalized patients aged 65 to 92 years to receive either a normal hospital diet plus 400 mL oral nutritional supplements (223 subjects) or a normal hospital diet plus a placebo (222 subjects) daily for 6 weeks. The composition of the supplement was such as to provide 995 kcal of energy and 100% of the Reference Nutrient Intakes for vitamins and minerals for a healthy older person. Patients had three assessments: at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at 6 months post-randomization. Outcome measures were 6 months of disability, non-elective readmission and length of hospital stay, discharge destination, morbidity, and mortality. Results Randomization to the supplement group led to a significant improvement in nutritional status. Over 6 months, 65 patients (29%) in the supplements group were readmitted to the hospital compared with 89 patients (40%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.94]). The mean length of hospital stay was 9.4 days in the supplements group compared with 10.1 days in the placebo group. Thirty-two people (14%) died in the supplement group compared with 19 people (9%) in the placebo group at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio 1.65 [95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.92]). Conclusion Oral nutritional supplementation of acutely ill patients improved nutritional status and led to a statistically significant reduction in the number of non-elective readmissions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.12.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early detection and intervention against disease-related malnutrition has been shown to improve nutritional status and reduce complications during hospital stay and non-elective readmissions.

    “Early detection and intervention against DRM has been shown to improve nutritional status and reduce complications during hospital stay and non-elective readmissions [9,43] (Level of Evidence 1þþ for both).”

    From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Abstract reports improved nutritional status and fewer non-elective readmissions after supplementation in hospitalized patients aged 65–92. The Clinical Outcomes section reports no clinically important difference in infections or length of hospital stay, so this trial does not support the claimed reduction in complications during the hospital stay. It studied supplementation, not early detection of malnutrition. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Gariballa SE. Nutrition and older people: special consideration for nutrition and ageing. Clin Med. 2004;4:411-413.
  2. MacIntosh CG, Morley JE, Horowitz M, Chapman IM. Anorexia of ageing. Nutrition. 2000;16:983-995.
  3. Gariballa SE, Parker SG, Taub N, Castleden CM. Nutritional status of hospitalised acute stroke patients. Br J Nutr. 1998;79(6):481-487.
  4. Gariballa SE, Parker SG, Taub N, Castleden CM. The influence of nutritional status on clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(2):275-281.
  5. Sullivan DH, Walls RC. Impact of nutritional status on morbidity in a population of geriatric rehabilitation patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994; 42:471-477.
  6. Sullivan DH, Walls RC, Bopp MM. Protein-energy under nutrition and the risk of mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:507-512.
  7. Chandra RK. Nutrition and the immune system: an introduction. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:460S-463S.
  8. Evans E, Stock AL. Dietary intake of geriatric patients in hospital. Nutr Metab. 1971;13:21-35.
  9. Friedmann JM, Jensen GL, Smiciklas-Wright ??, McCamish MA. Predicting early nonelective hospital readmission in nutritionally com- promised older adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65:1714-1720.
  10. Webester EJ. Validation of a Three Day Food Diary Against a Weighed Intake in Elderly Patients [dissertation for MSc of Medical Sciences in Human Nutrition]. Sheffield: The University of Sheffield; 2002.
  11. The Royal College of Physicians of London and The British Geriatrics Society. Standardised assessment scales for older people. A report of joint workshop. June 1992:1-27.
  12. Klein S, Kinney J, Jeejeebhoy K, et al. Nutrition support in clinical practice: review of published data. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:683-706.
  13. Weinsier RL, Heimburger DC. Distinguishing malnutrition from dis- ease: the search goes on. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:1063.
  14. Finch SDW, Lowe C, Bates CJ, Prendice A, Smithers G, Clarke PC. National Diet and Nutrition Survey People Aged 65 Years and Older, Vol. 1. London: The Stationary Office; 1998.
  15. Lawson RM, Doshi MK, Ingoe LE, Colligan JM, Barton JR, Cobden I. Compliance of orthopaedic patients with postoperative oral nutri- tional supplementation. Clin Nutr. 2000;19:171-175.
  16. Lad H, Gott M, Gariballa SE. Elderly patients compliance and elderly patients and health professional's, views, and attitudes towards prescribed sip-feed supplements. Nutrition, Health & Age- ing (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gariballa, S., Forster, S., Walters, S., & Powers, H.
Affiliations
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Gariballa, Salah
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
119
Issue
8
Pages
693-699
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075563350
Cited by
144
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
oral nutritional supplementation, older adults, acute illness, hospitalized patients, nutritional status, length of hospital stay, mortality, disability, discharge disposition, hospital food
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Diet, Double-Blind Method, Erythrocytes, Female, Folic Acid, Humans, Male, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutritional Status, Placebos, Vitamin B 12, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review