Cited by 189Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Hemoglobin A1c predicts diabetes but not cardiovascular disease in nondiabetic women

Open access
Pradhan, Aruna D., Rifai, Nader, Buring, Julie E., Ridker, Paul M.·2007·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a marker of cumulative glycemic exposure over the preceding 2- to 3-month period. Whether mild elevations of this biomarker provide prognostic information for development of clinically evident type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease among individuals at usual risk for these disorders is uncertain. Methods We examined baseline HbA1c levels as a predictor of incident clinical diabetes and cardiovascular disease (nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization procedure, ischemic stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes) in a prospective cohort study beginning in 1992 of 26,563 US female health professionals aged 45 years or more without diagnosed diabetes or vascular disease (median follow-up 10.1 years). Results During follow-up, 1238 cases of diabetes and 684 cardiovascular events occurred. In age-adjusted analyses using quintiles of HbA1c, a risk gradient was observed for both incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease. After multivariable adjustment, HbA1c remained a strong predictor of diabetes but was no longer significantly associated with incident cardiovascular disease. In analyses of threshold effects, adjusted relative risks for incident diabetes in HbA1c categories of less than 5.0%, 5.0% to 5.4%, 5.5% to 5.9%, 6.0% to 6.4%, 6.5% to 6.9%, and 7.0% or more were 1.0, 2.9, 12.1, 29.3, 28.2, and 81.2, respectively. Risk associations persisted after additional adjustment for C-reactive protein and after excluding individuals developing diabetes within 2 and 5 years of follow-up. Conclusions These prospective findings suggest that HbA1c levels are elevated well in advance of the clinical development of type 2 diabetes, supporting recent recommendations for lowering of diagnostic thresholds for glucose metabolic disorders. In contrast, the association of HbA1c with incident cardiovascular events is modest and largely attributable to coexistent traditional risk factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.03.022

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incidence of diabetes in people with A1C levels in the 6.0 to <6.5% range is more than 10 times that of people with lower levels.

    “Indeed, incidence of diabetes in people with A1C levels in this range is more than 10 times that of people with lower levels (4–7).”

    From Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (2013) · cites this paper as [5]

  • People within the A1C range of 5.5-6.0% have a 5-year cumulative incidence of diabetes that ranges from 12 to 25%.

    “Prospective studies indicate that people within the A1C range of 5.5–6.0% have a 5-year cumulative incidence of diabetes that ranges from 12 to 25% (4–7), which is appreciably (three- to eightfold) higher than incidence in the U.S. population as a whole (8).”

    From Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (2013) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brownlee M. Lilly Lecture 1993. Glycation and diabetic complica- tions. Diabetes. 1994;43:836-841.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pradhan, A. D., Rifai, N., Buring, J. E., & Ridker, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Pradhan, Aruna D.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
120
Issue
8
Pages
720-727
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013253830
Cited by
189
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl043851-10)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL058755, R01‐HL043851, HL43851, HL-58755)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-47988, R01CA047988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
HbA1c, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, non-diabetic women, diabetes prediction, cardiovascular risk, glycemic exposure, C-reactive protein, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular mortality
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Incidence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review