Cited by 209Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness

Dammhahn, Melanie, Almeling, Laura·2012·Animal Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.08.014

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dammhahn, M., & Almeling, L.
Affiliations
German Primate Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Dammhahn, Melanie
Venue
Animal Behaviour
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
84
Issue
5
Pages
1131-1139
ISSN
0003-3472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986677496
Cited by
208
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5
FWCI
7.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Animal Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Université d'Antananarivo
  • Commission Tripartite
  • CAFF of the Direction des Eaux et Forêts
  • CNFEREF Morondava
  • Deutsches Primatenzentrum Göttingen
  • University of Göttingen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
animal personality, boldness, risk-sensitive foraging, predation risk, gray mouse lemur, Microcebus murinus, repeatability, individual plasticity, coping styles, novel object test, exploratory behavior, feeding behaviour, body condition, Optimality Theory, foraging behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review