The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-intensity sweetener consumption and gut microbiome content and predicted gene function in a cross-sectional study of adults in the United States
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate gut microbiome in relation to recent high-intensity sweetener consumption in healthy adults.Methods Thirty-one adults completed a four-day food record and provided a fecal sample on the fifth day. Bacterial community in the samples was analyzed using multitag pyrosequencing. Across consumers and nonconsumers of aspartame and acesulfame-K, bacterial abundance was compared using nonparametric statistics, and bacterial diversity was compared using UniFrac analysis. Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) was used to predict mean relative abundance of gene function.Results There were seven aspartame consumers and seven acesulfame-K consumers. Three individuals overlapped groups, consuming both sweeteners. There were no differences in median bacterial abundance (class or order) across consumers and nonconsumers of either sweetener. Overall bacterial diversity was different across nonconsumers and consumers of aspartame (P < .01) and acesulfame-K (P = .03). Mean predicted gene abundance did not differ across consumers and nonconsumers of aspartame or acesulfame-K.Conclusions Bacterial abundance profiles and predicted gene function were not associated with recent dietary high-intensity sweetener consumption. However, bacterial diversity differed across consumers and nonconsumers. Given the increasing consumption of sweeteners and the role that the microbiome may have in chronic disease outcomes, work in further studies is warranted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although earlier human studies indicated detrimental effects on microbial diversity and composition (99, 100) and a more recent study linked consumption of nonnutritive sweeteners to a “dysbiosis” [an increasingly redundant term in microbiome research (171)] and a decrease in butyrate concentration (172), some reports have concluded that no clear effects of sweeteners on the microbiota can be”
From Diet and the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Million, M., Maraninchi, M., Henry, M., Armougom, F., Richet, H., Carrieri, P., Valéro, R., Raccah, D., Vialettes, B., & Raoult, D. (2011) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2011.153 · Cited by 684
RetractedNucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics
Stackebrandt, E. S., & Goodfellow, M. (1991) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 9,460
Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
Langille, M. G. I., Zaneveld, J., Caporaso, J. G., McDonald, D., Knights, D., Reyes, J. A., Clemente, J. C., Burkepile, D. E., Vega Thurber, R. L., Knight, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2676 · Cited by 9,116
UniFrac: a New Phylogenetic Method for Comparing Microbial Communities
Lozupone, C., & Knight, R. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.12.8228-8235.2005 · Cited by 8,227
Lane, D. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,190
Obesity alters gut microbial ecology
Ley, R. E., Bäckhed, F., Turnbaugh, P., Lozupone, C. A., Knight, R. D., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504978102 · Cited by 6,176
Turnbaugh, P. J., Ley, R. E., Hamady, M., Fraser-Liggett, C. M., Knight, R., & Gordon, J. I. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06244 · Cited by 6,091
Gut Microbiota in Human Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Differs from Non-Diabetic Adults
Larsen, N., Vogensen, F. K., van den Berg, F. W. J., Nielsen, D. S., Andreasen, A. S., Pedersen, B. K., Al-Soud, W. A., Sørensen, S. J., Hansen, L. H., & Jakobsen, M. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009085 · Cited by 2,952
Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota
Suez, J., Korem, T., Zeevi, D., Zilberman-Schapira, G., Thaiss, C. A., Maza, O., Israeli, D., Zmora, N., Gilad, S., Weinberger, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13793 · Cited by 2,067
Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass
Zhang, H., DiBaise, J. K., Zuccolo, A., Kudrna, D., Braidotti, M., Yu, Y., Parameswaran, P., Crowell, M. D., Wing, R., Rittmann, B. E., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812600106 · Cited by 1,880
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global Impacts of Western Diet and Its Effects on Metabolism and Health: A Narrative Review
Clemente‐Suárez, V. J., Beltrán-Velasco, A. I., Redondo-Flórez, L., Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Tornero-Aguilera, J. F. (2023) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu15122749 · Cited by 933
Lane, M. M., Davis, J. A., Beattie, S., Gómez‐Donoso, C., Loughman, A., O'Neil, A., Jacka, F., Berk, M., Page, R., Marx, W., et al. (2021) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.13146 · Cited by 564
de Toro‐Martín, J., Arsenault, B. J., Després, J., & Vohl, M. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9080913 · Cited by 534
“In this regard, a recent study has shown that gut bacterial diversity could be affected by recent (four-day food record) sweetener consumption (aspartame and acesulfame potassium) [142].”
BackgroundDiet and the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health
Berding, K., Vlckova, K., Marx, W., Schellekens, H., Stanton, C., Clarke, G., Jacka, F., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2021) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa181 · Cited by 451
Montero, C. G., Fraile‐Μartinez, O., Gomez-Lahoz, A. M., Pekarek, L., Castellanos, A. J., Noguerales-Fraguas, F., Coca, S., Guijarro, L. G., García‐Honduvilla, N., Asúnsolo, Á., et al. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13020699 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Frankenfeld, C. L., Sikaroodi, M., Lamb, E., Shoemaker, S., & Gillevet, P. M.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frankenfeld, Cara L.
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 736-742.e4
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1823483046
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 2.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- George Mason University Microbiome Analysis Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Keywords
- high-intensity sweeteners, gut microbiota, aspartame, acesulfame-K, bacterial diversity, bacterial abundance, healthy adults
- MeSH terms
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Aspartame, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Sweetening Agents, Thiazines, United States, Diet Records, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
