The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate
Open accessAbstract
This study was focused on the optimum conditions for preparing the protein isolate of quinoa seeds and investigates the physicochemical and functional properties of the isolated protein to assess the potential use of quinoa protein isolate in food applications and manufacturing. The protein isolate of quinoa was obtained by protein solubility at alkaline pH value (10), followed by precipitation at an acidic pH value (4.5). SDS–PAGE showed protein bands with 55 KDa corresponding to globulin and 31–33 KDa corresponding to chenoprotein in all extraction pHs. Quinoa protein had reasonable concentrations of essential amino acids (except tryptophan) with a high level of lysine (17.13%). A sharp minimum solubility was observed at the pH value (4.5), and the maximum value was observed at the alkaline pH value (10) (P > 0.05). Quinoa protein showed a high In Vitro digestibility (78.37 ± 1.08%). The quinoa protein showed water absorption (3.94 ± 0.06 ml/g) and (1.88 ± 0.02 ml/g) oil absorption. The foaming capacity of quinoa protein isolate was (69.28 ± 9.39% in average) and the foaming capacity was increased with the increase in the protein concentration. Quinoa protein isolate registered 54.54 ± 15.31% foam stability after 60 min. Emulsion ability index was ranged from 1.24 ± 0.05 m2/g for 0.1% protein suspension to 3.38 ± 0.31 m2/g for 3% protein suspension with average 2.10 ± 0.99 m2/g. The average of emulsion stability index was (38.43 ± 7.22 min). Quinoa protein isolate is a promising and impressive nutritive source, which is leading to candidate it as a food supplement and functional food but still needs more advanced research to improve and proof its functional properties to be convenient for using in food processing and additives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vega‐Gálvez, A., Miranda, M., Vergara, J., Uribe, E., Puente, L., & Martínez, E. A. (2010) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4158 · Cited by 985
Nutritional quality of the protein in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd) seeds
Ruales, J., & Nair, B. M. (1992) · Plant Foods for Human Nutrition · doi:10.1007/bf02196067 · Cited by 212
Bodwell, C. E., Satterlee, L. D., & Hackler, L. R. (1980) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/33.3.677 · Cited by 110
High-Cysteine 2S Seed Storage Proteins from Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)
Brinegar, C., Sine, B., & Nwokocha, L. (1996) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf950830+ · Cited by 91
Cited by
Quinoa protein: Composition, structure and functional properties
Dakhili, S., Abdolalizadeh, L., Hosseini, S. M., Shojaee-Aliabadi, S., & Mirmoghtadaie, L. (2019) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125161 · Cited by 363
Figueroa-González, J. J., Lobato-Calleros, C., Vernon-Carter, E. J., Aguirre-Mandujano, E., Alvarez-Ramirez, J., & Martínez-Velasco, A. (2022) · LWT · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112561 · Cited by 144
Rashwan, A. K., Osman, A. I., Abdelshafy, A. M., Mo, J., & Chen, W. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2279696 · Cited by 144
Rao, V., & Poonia, A. (2023) · Food Production, Processing and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s43014-023-00154-z · Cited by 62
Wang, S., Miao, S., & Sun, D.-W. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104285 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsohaimy, S. A., Refaay, T. M., & Zaytoun, M. A. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Agricultural Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-305
- ISSN
- 0570-1783 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2196592609
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.007
- The paper
- Elsohaimy, S. A., Refaay, T. M., & Zaytoun, M. A. M. (2015). Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate. Annals of Agricultural Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.