Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate

Open access
Elsohaimy, S.A., Refaay, T.M., Zaytoun, M.A.M.·2015·Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Abstract

This study was focused on the optimum conditions for preparing the protein isolate of quinoa seeds and investigates the physicochemical and functional properties of the isolated protein to assess the potential use of quinoa protein isolate in food applications and manufacturing. The protein isolate of quinoa was obtained by protein solubility at alkaline pH value (10), followed by precipitation at an acidic pH value (4.5). SDS–PAGE showed protein bands with 55 KDa corresponding to globulin and 31–33 KDa corresponding to chenoprotein in all extraction pHs. Quinoa protein had reasonable concentrations of essential amino acids (except tryptophan) with a high level of lysine (17.13%). A sharp minimum solubility was observed at the pH value (4.5), and the maximum value was observed at the alkaline pH value (10) (P > 0.05). Quinoa protein showed a high In Vitro digestibility (78.37 ± 1.08%). The quinoa protein showed water absorption (3.94 ± 0.06 ml/g) and (1.88 ± 0.02 ml/g) oil absorption. The foaming capacity of quinoa protein isolate was (69.28 ± 9.39% in average) and the foaming capacity was increased with the increase in the protein concentration. Quinoa protein isolate registered 54.54 ± 15.31% foam stability after 60 min. Emulsion ability index was ranged from 1.24 ± 0.05 m2/g for 0.1% protein suspension to 3.38 ± 0.31 m2/g for 3% protein suspension with average 2.10 ± 0.99 m2/g. The average of emulsion stability index was (38.43 ± 7.22 min). Quinoa protein isolate is a promising and impressive nutritive source, which is leading to candidate it as a food supplement and functional food but still needs more advanced research to improve and proof its functional properties to be convenient for using in food processing and additives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.007

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Elsohaimy, S. A., Refaay, T. M., & Zaytoun, M. A. M.
Venue
Annals of Agricultural Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
297-305
ISSN
0570-1783 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2196592609
Cited by
285
References
4
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.