Cited by 9

Recovery and characterisation of quinoa protein via neutral to alkaline extraction: Protein profiles and heat-induced aggregation behaviour

Cui, Hao, Roy, Debashree, Li, Siqi, Loo, Trevor S., Guo, Qing, Ye, Aiqian·2025·Current Research in Food Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101214

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher extraction pH and harsher treatments increase void-volume aggregates, which is consistent with irreversible association and altered solubility and interfacial behavior.

    “Higher extraction pH and harsher treatments increase void-volume aggregates, which is consistent with irreversible association and altered solubility and interfacial behavior”

    From Structure-function design of amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa proteins as hydrocolloids for emulsion and gel structuring (2027) · cites this paper as Cui et al., 2025

    The Results sections on solubility and heat-induced aggregation (page unavailable) link extreme alkaline extraction and heating to aggregation and reduced solubility; the interfacial-properties section reports differences between extraction pHs. But the paper does not identify the aggregates as void-volume aggregates or establish irreversible association. It also reports less additional heat-induced aggregation for protein extracted at pH 11 than at pH 9, so higher extraction pH does not uniformly increase aggregation under harsher treatment. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These treatments also increase ζ-potential magnitude and hydrophobic exposure while maintaining recognizable globulin structures.

    “These treatments also increase ζ -potential magnitude and hydrophobic exposure while maintaining recognizable globulin struc­ tures”

    From Structure-function design of amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa proteins as hydrocolloids for emulsion and gel structuring (2027) · cites this paper as Cui et al., 2025

    The Results and discussion sections on solubility and heat-induced aggregation report hydrophobic-group exposure under extreme alkaline conditions and greater retention of globular structures at mild alkaline pH. But the solubility section reports a decrease, not an increase, in surface charge from pH 9 to pH 11. The paper therefore does not support all three changes occurring together; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reported protein contents, Osborne-type fractions, SDS-PAGE profiles, SEC/HPSEC distributions, DLS particle size, ζ-potential, FTIR/CD spectra, and fluorescence responses are all sensitive to extraction pH, solvent system, ionic strength, defatting, dilution, filtration, drying, and residual co-components.

    “Reported protein contents, Osborne-type fractions, SDS-PAGE profiles, SEC/H­ PSEC distributions, DLS particle size, ζ -potential, FTIR/CD spectra, and fluorescence responses are all sensitive to extraction pH, solvent system, ionic strength, defatting, dilution, filtration, drying, and residual co-components”

    From Structure-function design of amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa proteins as hydrocolloids for emulsion and gel structuring (2027) · cites this paper as Cui et al., 2025

    The Results and discussion section reports that extraction pH changed protein yield, purity, and co-extracted carbohydrate content; the Conclusions also report effects on protein profiles and heat-induced aggregation. The paper does not establish that all the listed measurements are sensitive to every listed preparation factor. Defatting and freeze-drying appear as fixed preparation steps, not variables tested for their effects; the cited passages do not address Osborne fractions, SEC/HPSEC, ζ-potential, FTIR/CD, or fluorescence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Thermal and alkaline treatments tend to increase β-sheets, β-turns and decrease α-helix, consistent with enhanced β-aggregation and cross-linking.

    “Thermal and alkaline treatments tend to increase β -sheets, β -turns and decrease α -helix, consistent with enhanced β -aggregation and cross-linking”

    From Structure-function design of amaranth, buckwheat and quinoa proteins as hydrocolloids for emulsion and gel structuring (2027) · cites this paper as Cui et al., 2025

    The Results and discussion section (“Impact of extraction pH on the heat-induced aggregation of QPI”; page unavailable) reports heat-induced aggregation and suggests covalent interactions contribute to insoluble aggregates. It does not report increases in β-sheets or β-turns, a decrease in α-helix, or a link between those specific structural changes and aggregation; searches for those secondary-structure terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher extraction pH, from 9 to 11, and thermal treatments tend to increase void-volume aggregates and β-associated aggregation.

    “Higher extraction pH, from 9 to 11, and thermal treatments tend to increase void-volume aggregates and β -associated aggregation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Abugoch James L.E. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 58 2009 1 31 10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58001-1 19878856 · DOI
  2. Abugoch L.E. Romero N. Tapia C.A. Silva J. Rivera M. Study of some physicochemical and functional properties of Quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa willd) protein isolates J. Agric. Food Chem. 56 12 2008 4745 4750 10.1021/jf703689u 18489119 · DOI
  3. Bogahawaththa D. Bao Chau N.H. Trivedi J. Dissanayake M. Vasiljevic T. Impact of selected process parameters on solubility and heat stability of pea protein isolate Lwt 102 2019 246 253 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.034 31554112 · DOI
  4. Brinegar C. Sine B. Nwokocha L. High-cysteine 2S seed storage proteins from Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) J. Agric. Food Chem. 44 7 1996 1621 1623 10.1021/jf950830+ · DOI
  5. Burrieza H.P. Rizzo A.J. Moura Vale E. Silveira V. Maldonado S. Shotgun proteomic analysis of quinoa seeds reveals novel lysine-rich seed storage globulins Food Chem. 293 2019 299 306 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.04.098 31151615 · DOI
  6. Campos Assumpção de Amarante M. Ong L. Spyropoulos F. Gras S. Wolf B. Modulation of physico-chemical and technofunctional properties of quinoa protein isolate: effect of precipitation acid Food Chem. 457 2024 140399 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140399 39029314 · DOI
  7. Cui H. Li S. Roy D. Guo Q. Ye A. Modifying quinoa protein for enhanced functional properties and digestibility: a review Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2023 100604 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100604 PMC10570007 37840699 · DOI
  8. Das D. Mir N.A. Chandla N.K. Singh S. Combined effect of pH treatment and the extraction pH on the physicochemical, functional and rheological characteristics of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) seed protein isolates Food Chem. 353 2021 129466 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129466 33735770 · DOI
  9. Elsohaimy S.A. Refaay T.M. Zaytoun M.A.M. Physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate Ann. Agric. Sci. (Cairo) 60 2 2015 297 305 10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.007 · DOI
  10. Giteru S.G. Loveday S.M. Gathercole J. Cakebread J. Influence of extraction method on inherent properties and techno-functional behavior of quinoa protein ingredients Sustain. Food Protein 1 4 2023 135 148 10.1002/sfp2.1017 · DOI
  11. Janssen F. Pauly A. Rombouts I. Jansens K.J.A. Deleu L.J. Delcour J.A. Proteins of Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), Buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.), and Quinoa (Chenopodium spp.): a food science and technology perspective Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 16 1 2017 39 58 10.1111/1541-4337.12240 33371541 · DOI
  12. Lestari D. Mulder W. Sanders J. Improving Jatropha curcas seed protein recovery by using counter current multistage extraction Biochem. Eng. J. 50 1 2010 16 23 10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.011 · DOI
  13. Liu S. Xie Y. Li B. Li S. Yu W. Ye A. Guo Q. Structural properties of Quinoa protein isolate: impact of neutral to high alkaline extraction pH Foods 12 13 2023 PMC10340486 37444327
  14. López-Fernández M.P. Rodríguez S.D. Favre L.C. Busch V.M. Buera M.d.P. Physicochemical, thermal and rheological properties of isolated Argentina quinoa starch Lwt 135 2021 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110113 · DOI
  15. Lopez D.N. Galante M. Robson M. Boeris V. Spelzini D. Amaranth, quinoa and chia protein isolates: physicochemical and structural properties Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109 2018 152 159 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.12.080 29247732 · DOI
  16. Luo L. Cheng L. Zhang R. Yang Z. Impact of high-pressure homogenization on physico-chemical, structural, and rheological properties of quinoa protein isolates Food Struct. 32 2022 10.1016/j.foostr.2022.100265 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mäkinen O.E. Zannini E. Arendt E.K. Modifying the cold gelation properties of Quinoa protein isolate: influence of heat-denaturation pH in the alkaline range Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 70 3 2015 250 256 10.1007/s11130-015-0487-4 25986749 · DOI
  18. Mitropoulos V. Mütze A. Fischer P. Mechanical properties of protein adsorption layers at the air/water and oil/water interface: a comparison in light of the thermodynamical stability of proteins Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 206 2014 195 206 24332621
  19. Mota da Silva A.M. Souza Almeida F. Kawazoe Sato A.C. Functional characterization of commercial plant proteins and their application on stabilization of emulsions J. Food Eng. 292 2021 110277 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110277 · DOI
  20. Okon O.G. The nutritional applications of Quinoa seeds Varma A. Biology and Biotechnology of Quinoa: Super Grain for Food Security 2021 Springer Singapore 35 49 10.1007/978-981-16-3832-9_3 · DOI
  21. Quiroga A. Martínez E.N. Rogniaux H. Geairon A. Añón M.C. Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) vicilin subunit structure J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 24 2010 12957 12963 10.1021/jf103296n 21117690 · DOI
  22. Raikos V. Duthie G. Ranawana V. Denaturation and oxidative stability of Hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) protein isolate as affected by heat treatment Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 70 3 2015 304 309 10.1007/s11130-015-0494-5 26142888 · DOI
  23. Ruiz G.A. Opazo-Navarrete M. Meurs M. Minor M. Sala G. van Boekel M. Stieger M. Janssen A.E. Denaturation and in vitro gastric digestion of heat-treated quinoa protein isolates obtained at various extraction pH Food Biophys. 11 2016 184 197 10.1007/s11483-016-9429-4 27212897 PMC4851711 · DOI
  24. Ruiz G.A. Xiao W. van Boekel M. Minor M. Stieger M. Effect of extraction pH on heat-induced aggregation, gelation and microstructure of protein isolate from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) Food Chem. 209 2016 203 210 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.052 27173553 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Shen Y. Tang X. Li Y. Drying methods affect physicochemical and functional properties of quinoa protein isolate Food Chem. 339 2021 127823 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127823 32829242 · DOI
  26. Shen Z.-J. Xu S.-X. Huang Q.-Y. Li Z.-Y. Xu Y.-D. Lin C.-S. Huang Y.-J. TMT proteomics analysis of a pseudocereal crop, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), during seed maturation [Original Research] Front. Plant Sci. 13 2022 10.3389/fpls.2022.975073 PMC9678934 36426144 · DOI
  27. Shevchenko A. Tomas H. Havli J. Olsen J.V. Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes Nat. Protoc. 1 6 2006 2856 2860 17406544
  28. Tang C.-H. Globular proteins as soft particles for stabilizing emulsions: concepts and strategies Food Hydrocoll. 103 2020 105664 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105664 · DOI
  29. Van de Vondel J. Lambrecht M.A. Delcour J.A. Osborne extractability and chromatographic separation of protein from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) wholemeal Lwt 126 2020 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109321 · DOI
  30. Van de Vondel J. Lambrecht M.A. Housmans J.A.J. Rousseau F. Schymkowitz J. Delcour J.A. Impact of hydrothermal treatment on denaturation and aggregation of water-extractable quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) protein Food Hydrocoll. 115 2021 106611 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106611 · DOI
  31. Wang S. Miao S. Sun D.-W. Modifying structural and techno-functional properties of quinoa proteins through extraction techniques and modification methods Trends Food Sci. Technol. 143 2024 104285 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104285 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yang J. Kornet R. Ntone E. Meijers M.G.J. van den Hoek I.A.F. Sagis L.M.C. Venema P. Meinders M.B.J. Berton-Carabin C.C. Nikiforidis C.V. Hinderink E.B.A. Plant protein aggregates induced by extraction and fractionation processes: impact on techno-functional properties Food Hydrocoll. 155 2024 110223 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.110223 · DOI
  33. Zhang R. Cheng L. Luo L. Hemar Y. Yang Z. Formation and characterisation of high-internal-phase emulsions stabilised by high-pressure homogenised quinoa protein isolate Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 631 2021 127688 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127688 · DOI

Authors
Cui, H., Roy, D., Li, S., Loo, T. S., Guo, Q., & Ye, A.
Venue
Current Research in Food Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
Volume
11
Pages
101214
ISSN
2665-9271
Cited by
9
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment (MAUX 2013)
  • Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review