The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The language of US corporate environmental disclosure
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 · Cited by 2,069
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- Abrahamson, 1994, Concealment of negative organizational outcomes: An agency theory perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1302, 10.2307/256674 · DOI · Paper page
- Aerts, 1994, On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 337, 10.1016/0361-3682(94)90001-9 · DOI
- Aerts, 2005, Picking up the pieces: Impression management in the retrospective attributional framing of accounting outcomes, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 493, 10.1016/j.aos.2004.07.001 · DOI
- Aerts, 2009, Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 1, 10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.005 · DOI
- Berthelot, 2003, Environmental disclosure research: Review and synthesis, Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 1
- Bewley, 2000, Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, 1, 201, 10.1016/S1479-3598(00)01011-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Bligh, 2004, Charting the language of leadership: A methodological investigation of President Bush and the crisis of 9/11, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 562, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.562 · DOI
- Cho, 2006, Corporate political strategy: An Examination of the relation between political expenditures, environmental performance, and environmental disclosure, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 139, 10.1007/s10551-006-9019-3 · DOI
- Cho, 2009, Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility: An experimental investigation of visual website disclosures, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22, 933, 10.1108/09513570910980481 · DOI
- Clarkson, 2008, Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 303, 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Clatworthy, 2001, The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report reliability, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14, 311, 10.1108/09513570110399890 · DOI · Paper page
- Clatworthy, 2003, Financial reporting of good news and bad news: Evidence from accounting narratives, Accounting and Business Research, 33, 171, 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729645 · DOI · Paper page
- Cormier, 2004, Corporate environmental reporting: Contrasting management’s values with reality, Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 143, 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000015844.86206.b9 · DOI
- Cowen, 1987, The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosures: A typology and frequency-based analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 111, 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Demers, E. A., & Vega, C. (2009). Soft information in earnings announcement: News or Noise? 32nd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association Paper. Available at SSRN: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=1152326>.
- Elsbach, 1994, Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts, Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 57, 10.2307/2393494 · DOI · Paper page
- Elsbach, 1992, Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 699, 10.2307/256313 · DOI · Paper page
- Epstein, 1994, Social disclosure and the individual investor, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7, 94, 10.1108/09513579410069867 · DOI · Paper page
- Ginzel, 1992, Organizational impression management as a reciprocal influence process: The neglected role of the organizational audience, Vol. 15, 227
- Hackston, 1996, Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 77, 10.1108/09513579610109987 · DOI
- Henry, 2008, Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written?, Journal of Business Communication, 45, 363, 10.1177/0021943608319388 · DOI · Paper page
- Hillman, 2001, Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line?, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125, 10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- Hopwood, 2009, Accounting and the environment, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 433, 10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Hughes, 2001, Corporate environmental disclosures: Are they useful in determining environmental performance?, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20, 217, 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00031-X · DOI · Paper page
- Jameson, 2000, Telling the investment story: A narrative analysis of shareholder reports, Journal of Business Communications, 37, 7, 10.1177/002194360003700101 · DOI
- Johnson, 1993, Research on environmental reporting, Accounting Horizons, 7, 118
- Jones, 1994, Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability, Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 141
- Jones, 1996, Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence – A comment to contextualize, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9, 86, 10.1108/09513579610116376 · DOI
- KLD Research and Analytics, Inc. (2003). KLD ratings data: Inclusive social rating criteria. Cambridge, MA.
- Livesey, 2002, Transparent and caring corporations?, Organization and Environment, 15, 233, 10.1177/1086026602153001 · DOI
- Magness, 2006, Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19, 540, 10.1108/09513570610679128 · DOI
- Merkl-Davies, 2007, Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management?, Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116
- Milne, 2002, Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 372, 10.1108/09513570210435889 · DOI · Paper page
- Nelson, K. K., & Pritchard, A. C. (2008). Litigation risk and voluntary disclosure: The use of meaningful cautionary language. 2008 American accounting association paper. Available at SSRN: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=998590>.
- Neu, 1998, Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 265, 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00008-1 · DOI
- Ober, 1999, Telling it like it is: The use of certainty in public business discourse, Journal of Business Communication, 36, 280, 10.1177/002194369903600304 · DOI
- Patten, 1992, Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 471, 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90042-Q · DOI · Paper page
- Patten, 2002, The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 763, 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00028-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Reitenga, 2000, Environmental regulation, capital intensity, and cross-sectional variation in market returns, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 189, 10.1016/S0278-4254(00)00008-9 · DOI
- Roberts, 1992, Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 595, 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K · DOI · Paper page
- Rutherford, 2003, Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance, Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 187, 10.1023/A:1023647615279 · DOI
- Short, 2008, The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management, Organizational Research Methods, 11, 727, 10.1177/1094428107304534 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith, 2000, The chairman’s statement: A content analysis of discretionary narrative disclosures, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13, 624, 10.1108/09513570010353738 · DOI · Paper page
- Subramanian, 1993, Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations, Journal of Business Communication, 30, 50, 10.1177/002194369303000103 · DOI
- Sydserff, 2002, Developments in content analysis: A transitivity index and DICTION scores, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 523, 10.1108/09513570210440586 · DOI
- Thomas, 1997, Discourse in the marketplace: The making of meaning in annual reports, Journal of Business Communication, 34, 126, 10.1177/002194369703400103 · DOI
- Waddock, 1997, The corporate social performance – financial performance link, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI · Paper page
- Yuthas, 2002, Communicative action and corporate annual reports, Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 141, 10.1023/A:1021314626311 · DOI
Cited by
ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018) · Global Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 · Cited by 1,611
Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003 · Cited by 1,066
Self-citationVoluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting and Public Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004 · Cited by 1,031
Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3 · Cited by 926
Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation
Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.12.001 · Cited by 652
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-443
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092728120
- Cited by
- 836
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.