Cited by 45Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesBone health and osteoporosis researchNutrition and Health in Aging

Incidence of bone loss, falls, and fractures after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

Berarducci, Adrienne, Haines, Krista, Murr, Michel M.·2009·Applied Nursing Research

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of and associated risks for falls and fractures after gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity and to determine the clinical signs of bone loss. The sample consisted of 167 individuals at a mean age of 47 years (SD = 10). Ten participants (6%) reported a decrease in height since surgery, and 33 (20%) reported a decrease in height since they were 20 years old. Eight participants (5%) reported postoperative fractures. Twenty-three participants (13.8%) reported falling once since surgery, and 34 (20.4%) reported falling two or more times since surgery. Twelve participants reported a new diagnosis of osteoporosis postoperatively, and 1 participant reported a new diagnosis of osteopenia. Sixty-seven percent (n = 112) of the participants were never advised to undergo a bone density test postoperatively. The findings from this study suggest that bone loss is a critical issue in this patient population, with 25% (n = 42) reporting a decrease in height, 8% (n = 13) reporting a new diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia, and 5% (n = 8) reporting fractures during a mean postoperative interval of 2.4 years. In addition, risk for skeletal fragility is profound in this cohort of individuals, with 34% (n = 57) indicating a history of one or more falls postoperatively. The results from this study clearly indicate a need for early recognition of bone loss in this population so that timely interventions can be initiated to prevent further loss and subsequent fractures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnr.2007.03.004

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A historical cohort study with median follow-up 7.7 years found that bariatric subjects had increased incidence of all fractures, fractures due to minimal or moderate trauma, and fractures at the hip, spine, wrist, or humerus.

    “Bariatric subjects had an increased incidence of all fracture, fractures due to minimal or moderate trauma and specifically of fractures at the hip spine, wrist of humerus.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berarducci, A., Haines, K., & Murr, M. M.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Berarducci, Adrienne
Venue
Applied Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
35-41
ISSN
0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973095344
Cited by
45
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, morbid obesity, bone loss, falls, fracture, osteoporosis, osteopenia, height loss, bone densitometry, bone fragility, bariatric surgery complications
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Morbid, Osteoporosis, Cohort Studies, Gastric Bypass, Incidence, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review