Cited by 75Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Avatar-based depression self-management technology: promising approach to improve depressive symptoms among young adults

Open access
Pinto, Melissa D., Hickman, Ronald L., Clochesy, John, Buchner, Marc·2013·Applied Nursing Research

Abstract

Major depressive disorder is prevalent among American young adults and predisposes young adults to serious impairments in psychosocial functioning. Without intervention, young adults with depressive symptoms are at high risk for worsening of depressive symptoms and developing major depressive disorder. Young adults are not routinely taught effective depression self management skills to reduce depressive symptoms and preempt future illness. This study reports initial results of a randomized controlled trial among young adults (18-25 years of age) with depressive symptoms who were exposed to an avatar-based depression self-management intervention, eSMART-MH. Participants completed self-report measures of depressive symptoms at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks follow-up. Participants who received eSMART-MH had a significant reduction in depressive symptoms over 3 months, while individuals in the attention-control condition had no change in symptoms. In this study, eSMART-MH demonstrated initial efficacy and is a promising developmentally appropriate depression self-management intervention for young adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnr.2012.08.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pinto, M. D., Hickman, R. L., Clochesy, J., & Buchner, M.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Venue
Applied Nursing Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
45-48
ISSN
0897-1897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053033463
Cited by
75
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000440)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (L30MH091738)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
depressive symptoms, young adults, major depressive disorder, digital mental health interventions, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Self Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review