Cited by 84Digital Mental Health InterventionsSocial Robot Interaction and HRIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Chatbot features for anxiety and depression: a scoping review

Open access
Ahmed, Arfan, Hassan, Asmaa, Aziz, Sarah, Abd-alrazaq, Alaa A, Ali, Nashva, Alzubaidi, Mahmood, Al-Thani, Dena, Elhusein, Bushra +3 more·2023·Health Informatics Journal

Abstract

Chatbots can provide valuable support to patients in assessing and guiding management of various health problems particularly when human resources are scarce. Chatbots can be affordable and efficient on-demand virtual assistants for mental health conditions, including anxiety and depression. We review features of chatbots available for anxiety or depression. Six bibliographic databases were searched including backward and forwards reference list checking. The initial search returned 1302 citations. Post-filtering, 42 studies remained forming the final dataset for this scoping review. Most of the studies were from conference proceedings (62%, 26/42), followed by journal articles (26%, 11/42), reports (7%, 3/42), or book chapters (5%, 2/42). About half of the reviewed chatbots had functionality targeting both anxiety and depression (60%, 25/42), whereas 38% (16/42) targeted only depression, 38% (16/42) anxiety and the remaining addressed other mental health issues along with anxiety and depression. Avatars or fictional characters were rarely used in these studies only 26% (11/42) despite their increasing popularity. Mental health chatbots could benefit in helping patients with anxiety and depression and provide valuable support to mental healthcare workers, particularly when resources are scarce. Real-time personal virtual assistance fills in this gap . Their role in mental health care is expected to increase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14604582221146719

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital technologies enable remote collection of large volumes of clinically relevant data that may be less burdensome than traditional in-clinic visits and more reflective of clinically relevant changes.

    “These technologies enable the remote collection of large volumes of clinically relevant data, which may be less burdensome than traditional in-clinic visits and more reflective of clinically relevant changes (20, 21).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. World Health Organization, 2013, Mental health action plan 2013-2020
  2. World Health Organization, Depression – Key facts
  3. Ali MR, Razavi Z, Mamun AA, et al. A virtual conversational agent for teens with autism: experimental results and design lessons. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03046, 2018. · arXiv
  4. 10.2196/12106 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Podrazhansky A, for Computing Machinery, 2020, 2020, 311
  6. Lim DS, 2017, Predicting outcomes in online chatbot-mediated therapy
  7. Delahunty F, 2018, Intelligence and Cognitive Science, 327
  8. Kataria P, 2018, Int J Pure Appl Maths, 118, 349
  9. 10.2196/mental.9782 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Yang W, 2020, Proceedings of deep learning for wellbeing applications leveraging mobile devices and edge computing, Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, 10
  11. van Cuylenburg HC, 2021, (UCET), 1
  12. Pola S, 2021, Mater Today Proc, 170, 929
  13. Gupta A, 2022 international conference for advancement in technology (ICONAT), 2022, January, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, A., Hassan, A., Aziz, S., Abd-alrazaq, A. A., Ali, N., Alzubaidi, M., Al-Thani, D., Elhusein, B., Siddig, M. A., Ahmed, M., & Househ, M.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA)
  • College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar
  • Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
Corresponding author
Househ, Mowafa
Venue
Health Informatics Journal
Published
2023-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
14604582221146719-14604582221146719
ISSN
  • 1355-4743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4582
  • 1741-2811
OpenAlex
W4317870342
Cited by
82
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 7
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Informatics Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP12S-0303-190204)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
chatbots, anxiety, depression, mental health, avatars, virtual assistants, mental health services, resource-scarce settings
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Depression, Humans, Mental Health, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review