Cited by 127Digital Mental Health InterventionsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityMental Health Treatment and Access

An evaluation of an online peer support forum for university students with depressive symptoms

Open access
Horgan, Aine, McCarthy, Geraldine, Sweeney, John·2013·Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

Abstract

Background Depression is the most common mental health problem among young people, particularly university students, with prevalence rates as high as 48% reported. This population however, is reluctant to seek professional help. Online interventions may be particularly appealing to students, with evidence suggesting that they use the Internet for mental health support. While there are many mental health resources on the Internet few focus specifically on the needs of young people and few have been evaluated. This research aimed to develop and pilot test an online peer support intervention for students experiencing depressive symptoms.Methods A depression support Web site (www.losetheblues.ie) was designed specifically for 18-24 year old students. The study used a mixed method, involving quantitative descriptive, pre- and post-test and qualitative descriptive designs. Data were collected using the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), a background questionnaire and online forum posts.Results The sample consisted of 117 university students with self-reported depressive symptoms. Results from participants in the pre- and post-test element of the study, showed no statistical significance. The forum posts revealed that the participants' main difficulties were loneliness and perceived lack of socialization skills. The Web site provided a place for sharing, offering and receiving emotional and informational support.Conclusion Developing health care interventions in an online environment presents unique challenges to the research process, however they have the potential to provide mental health care that is accessible and affordable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnu.2012.12.005

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horgan, A., McCarthy, G., & Sweeney, J.
Affiliations
University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
  • Horgan, Aine
  • McCarthy, Geraldine
  • Sweeney, John
Venue
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
84-89
ISSN
0883-9417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040831923
Cited by
127
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Psychiatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
online peer support, university students, depressive symptoms, depression, online intervention, online forums, loneliness, socialization skills, help-seeking, youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Peer Group, Self-Help Groups, Students, Universities, Program Evaluation, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review