Cited by 606Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

Receiving social support online: implications for health education

White, M.·2001·Health Education Research

Abstract

Online support groups are expanding as the general public becomes more comfortable using computer-mediated communication technology. These support groups have certain benefits for users who may not be able to or do not have the desire to attend face-to-face sessions. Online support groups also present challenges when compared to traditional face-to-face group communication. Communication difficulties may arise resulting from lack of visual and aural cues found in traditional face-to-face communication. Online support groups have emerged within health care as a result of the need individuals have to know more about health conditions they are confronting. The proliferation of these online communities may provide an opportunity for health educators to reach target populations with specific messages. This paper reviews the development of health-related online support groups, examines research conducted within these communities, compares their utility with traditional support groups and discusses the implications of these groups for health education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/16.6.693

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing anonymous participation in a learning environment can encourage wider participation as it inculcates a sense of safety and privacy.

    “Providing anonymous participation in a learning environment can encourage wider participation as it inculcates a sense of safety and privacy (White and Dorman 2001).”

    From Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning (2018) · cites this paper as White and Dorman 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, M.
Affiliations
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (US)
Corresponding author
White, M.
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
693-707
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2136715587
Cited by
606
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 21
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Keywords
online support groups, social support, computer-mediated communication, health education, online communities, communication barriers, health information seeking
MeSH terms
Attitude to Computers, Computer Communication Networks, Disease, Health Education, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Online Systems, Patient Participation, Self-Help Groups, Social Support, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review