Cited by 88Eating Disorders and BehaviorsDigital Mental Health InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Evaluation and deployment of evidence based patient self-management support program for bulimia nervosa

Carrard, Isabelle, Rouget, Patrick, Fernández-Aranda, Fernando, Volkart, Anne-Christine, Damoiseau, Maria, Lam, Tony·2006·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objective This article presents initial results from a European multi-centre study to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of an online self-help treatment support program for Bulimia Nervosa (BN).Method The online program is based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and consists of seven steps that patients work through progressively. An overall sample of 141 women suffering from BN used the program over a 6-month period. Patients were supported by three face-to-face evaluation interviews with a therapist, and a weekly e-mail contact. Data on general psychopathology and specific eating disorder symptoms were also collected at the evaluation interviews.Results Initial results from the Swiss sample (N=41) showed significant improvement of overall psychological health (p<.001) as measured by the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90R), and for all dimensions of the Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI-2).Conclusion An online Self-Help program for BN can be used effectively to reduce eating disorder symptoms in Bulimic patients and user feedback showed that this approach contributed to increase patient involvement and service availability. Additional data from the other centers will further inform the efficacy and impact of this approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.031

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carrard, I., Rouget, P., Fernández-Aranda, F., Volkart, A.-C., Damoiseau, M., & Lam, T.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • NetUnion (Switzerland) (CH)
Corresponding author
Carrard, Isabelle
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
101-109
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041287714
Cited by
88
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, online self-help program, patient self-management, cognitive behavioral therapy, eating disorder symptoms, program effectiveness, feasibility, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Europe, Female, Humans, Self Care, Social Support, Program Evaluation, Evidence-Based Medicine, Internet, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review