Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies

Carlucci, Domenico, Nocella, Giuseppe, De Devitiis, Biagia, Viscecchia, Rosaria, Bimbo, Francesco, Nardone, Gianluca·2015·Appetite
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Allom, 2012, Self-regulation versus habit. The influence of self-schema on fruit and vegetable consumption, Psychology Health, 27, 7, 10.1080/08870446.2011.605138 · DOI
  2. Altintzoglou, 2010, A voice-of-consumer approach in development of new seafood product concepts, Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 19, 130, 10.1080/10498850.2010.493636 · DOI
  3. Altintzoglou, 2010, Translating barriers into potential improvements. The case of new healthy seafood product development, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 224, 10.1108/07363761011038293 · DOI
  4. Altintzoglou, 2011, Association of health involvement and attitudes towards eating fish on farmed and wild fish consumption in Belgium, Norway and Spain, Aquaculture International, 19, 475, 10.1007/s10499-010-9363-2 · DOI
  5. Arvanitoyannis, 2004, A marketing survey on Greek consumers' attitudes towards fish, Aquaculture International, 12, 259, 10.1023/B:AQUI.0000036137.29397.12 · DOI
  6. Berndsen, 2004, Ambivalence towards meat, Appetite, 42, 71, 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00119-3 · DOI
  7. Birch, 2012, Buying seafood. Understanding barriers to purchase across consumption segments, Food Quality and Preference, 26, 12, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.004 · DOI
  8. Birch, 2014, The role of habit, childhood consumption, familiarity and attitudes across seafood consumption segments in Australia, Journal of Food Products Marketing, 20, 98, 10.1080/10454446.2012.732548 · DOI
  9. Birch, 2012, Drivers and barriers to seafood consumption in Australia, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, 64, 10.1108/07363761211193055 · DOI
  10. Brécard, 2009, Determinants of demand for green products. An application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe, Ecological Economics, 69, 115, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.017 · DOI
  11. Brécard, 2012, Consumer preferences for eco, health and fair trade labels. An application to seafood product in France, Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 10, 10.1515/1542-0485.1360 · DOI
  12. Brunsø, 2009, Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations. Exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium, British Food Journal, 111, 699, 10.1108/00070700910972387 · DOI
  13. Burger, 2009, Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption. Individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits, Environmental Research, 109, 343, 10.1016/j.envres.2008.12.002 · DOI
  14. Camacho-Cuena, 2003, An experimental test of response consistency in contingent valuation, Ecological Economics, 47, 167, 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00192-7 · DOI
  15. Cardoso, 2013, Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the Portuguese population. Gender and regional variability, Appetite, 64, 20, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.022 · DOI
  16. Claret, 2012, Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis. Exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price, Food Quality and Preference, 26, 259, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.006 · DOI
  17. Conner, 2001, Ambivalence and attitudes, Vol. 12, 37
  18. Cosmina, 2012, Italian consumers' attitudes towards small pelagic fish, New Medit, 11, 52
  19. Debucquet, 2012, Perception of oyster-based products by French consumers. The effect of processing and role of social representations, Appetite, 59, 844, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.08.020 · DOI
  20. Grieger, 2012, Knowledge and barriers relating to fish consumption in older Australians, Appetite, 59, 456, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.009 · DOI
  21. Hall, 2013, Factors influencing consumption of farmed seafood products in the Pacific Northwest, Appetite, 66, 1, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.02.012 · DOI
  22. Hansen, 2011, Extrinsic cues and consumer judgments of food product introductions. The case of Pangasius in Norway, Journal of Food Products Marketing, 17, 536, 10.1080/10454446.2011.618791 · DOI
  23. Honkanen, 2005, Intention to consume seafood. The importance of habit, Appetite, 45, 161, 10.1016/j.appet.2005.04.005 · DOI
  24. Hughner, 2009, Fish. Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers, Food Policy, 34, 185, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.002 · DOI
  25. Jaffry, 2004, Consumer choices for quality and sustainability labelled seafood products in the UK, Food Policy, 29, 215, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.04.001 · DOI
  26. Johnston, 2001, Measuring consumer preferences for eco-labelled seafood. An international comparison, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26, 20
  27. Juhl, 2000, Antecedents and effects of consumer involvement in fish as a product group, Appetite, 34, 261, 10.1006/appe.2000.0318 · DOI
  28. Kole, 2009, The effects of different types of product information on the consumer product evaluation for fresh cod in real life settings, Food Quality and Preference, 20, 187, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.09.003 · DOI
  29. Kothe, 2012, Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. Testing an intervention based on the theory of planned behaviour, Appetite, 58, 997, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.012 · DOI
  30. Lawley, 2012, An exploratory study into the role and interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic cues in Australian consumers' evaluations of fish, Australasian Marketing Journal, 20, 260, 10.1016/j.ausmj.2012.05.014 · DOI
  31. Loose, 2012, Quantifying effects of convenience and product packaging on consumer preferences and market share of seafood products. The case of oysters, Food Quality and Preference, 28, 492, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.004 · DOI
  32. Mauracher, 2013, Consumer preferences regarding the introduction of new organic products. The case of the Mediterranean sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Italy, Appetite, 63, 84, 10.1016/j.appet.2012.12.009 · DOI
  33. McManus, 2012, Attitudes towards seafood and patterns of consumption in an Australian coastal town, Nutrition Bulletin, 37, 224, 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2012.01978.x · DOI
  34. Mullan, 2014, Self-regulation and the intention behaviour gap. Exploring dietary behaviours in university students, Appetite, 73, 7, 10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.010 · DOI
  35. Mullan, 2013, Predicting saturated fat consumption. Exploring the role of subjective well-being, Psychology (Savannah, Ga.), 18, 515
  36. Myrland, 2000, Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway. Lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption, Food Quality and Preference, 11, 169, 10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00034-8 · DOI
  37. Neale, 2012, Comparing attitudes to fish consumption between clinical trial participants and non-trial individuals, Nutrition and Dietetics, 69, 124, 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2012.01585.x · DOI
  38. Olsen, 2001, Consumer involvement in seafood as family meals in Norway. An application of the expectancy-value approach, Appetite, 36, 173, 10.1006/appe.2001.0393 · DOI
  39. Olsen, 2003, Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption. The mediating role of attitude, health involvement and convenience, Food Quality and Preference, 14, 199, 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00055-1 · DOI
  40. Olsen, 2008, Explaining intention to consume a new fish product. A cross-generational and cross-cultural comparison, Food Quality and Preference, 19, 618, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.04.007 · DOI
  41. Olsen, 2007, Exploring the relationship between convenience and fish consumption. A cross-cultural study, Appetite, 49, 84, 10.1016/j.appet.2006.12.002 · DOI
  42. Pieniak, 2010, Health-related attitudes as a basis for segmenting European fish consumers, Food Policy, 35, 448, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.002 · DOI
  43. Pieniak, 2010, Health-related beliefs and consumer knowledge as determinants of fish consumption, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 23, 480, 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01045.x · DOI
  44. Pieniak, 2007, European consumers' use of and trust in information sources about fish, Food Quality and Preference, 18, 1050, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.05.001 · DOI
  45. Read, 2003, Management of environmental impacts of marine aquaculture in Europe, Aquaculture (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 226, 139, 10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00474-5 · DOI
  46. Rortveit, 2007, The role of consideration set size in explaining fish consumption, Appetite, 49, 214, 10.1016/j.appet.2007.02.005 · DOI
  47. Rortveit, 2009, Combining the role of convenience and consideration set size in explaining fish consumption in Norway, Appetite, 52, 313, 10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.001 · DOI
  48. Scholderer, 2008, The dynamics of consumer behaviour on habit, discontent, and other fish to fry, Appetite, 51, 576, 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.011 · DOI
  49. Stefani, 2012, Exploring consumer's preferences for farmed sea bream, Aquaculture International, 20, 673, 10.1007/s10499-011-9495-z · DOI
  50. Sveinsdóttir, 2009, Sensory characteristics of different cod products related to consumer preferences and attitudes, Food Quality and Preference, 20, 120, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.09.002 · DOI
  51. Thorsdottir, 2012, A model of fish consumption among young consumers, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29, 4, 10.1108/07363761211193000 · DOI
  52. Trondsen, 2004, Health and seafood consumption patterns among women aged 45–69 years. A Norwegian seafood consumption study, Food Quality and Preference, 15, 117, 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00038-7 · DOI
  53. Trondsen, 2004, Consumption of seafood. The influence of overweight and health beliefs, Food Quality and Preference, 15, 361, 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00083-1 · DOI
  54. Trondsen, 2003, Perceived barriers to consumption of fish among Norwegian women, Appetite, 41, 301, 10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00108-9 · DOI
  55. Vanhonacker, 2011, Does fish origin matter to European consumers? Insights from a consumer survey in Belgium, Norway and Spain, British Food Journal, 113, 535, 10.1108/00070701111124005 · DOI
  56. Verbeke, 2007, Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish. Exploratory insights from Belgium, Aquaculture International, 15, 121, 10.1007/s10499-007-9072-7 · DOI
  57. Verbeke, 2005, Individual determinants of fish consumption. Application of the theory of planned behaviour, Appetite, 44, 67, 10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006 · DOI
  58. Verbeke, 2008, Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption. Impact on Belgian consumers' perception and intention to eat fish, Risk Analysis, 28, 951, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01075.x · DOI
  59. Verbeke, 2007, Consumer evaluation of fish quality as basis for fish market segmentation, Food Quality and Preference, 18, 651, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.005 · DOI
  60. Welch, 2002, Variability of fish consumption within the 10 European countries participating in the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study, Public Health Nutrition, 5, 1273, 10.1079/PHN2002404 · DOI
  61. Wong, 2009, Predicting breakfast consumption. An application of the theory of planned behaviour and the investigation of past behaviour and executive function, British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 489, 10.1348/135910708X360719 · DOI

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
84
Pages
212-227
ISSN
0195-6663
DOI
10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008
Cited by
328
References
5
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008
The paper
Carlucci, D., Nocella, G., De Devitiis, B., Viscecchia, R., Bimbo, F., & Nardone, G. (2015). Consumer purchasing behaviour towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.