Cited by 73Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Influence of the involvement in food waste reduction on attitudes towards sustainable products containing seafood by-products

Open access
Altintzoglou, Themistoklis, Honkanen, Pirjo, Whitaker, Ragnhild Dragøy·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

This study sought to uncover how consumers’ first associations and attitudes are influenced by involvement in food waste reduction and if this can be explained by consumer personality characteristics. This study investigated consumer attitudes towards products in three categories: (i) processed food, (ii) nutrition supplements and (iii) cosmetics. Products were presented to consumers in the UK as containing by-product ingredients (control) vs possessing either a health or an environmental benefit (experimental conditions). The findings indicate that consumers in general responded positively to the product when told that it contributes to food waste reduction or improved public health via use of the entire raw material, such as whole shrimp, crab or mussel, except in the case of cosmetics. Consumers with a high involvement in food waste reduction tended to be more sceptical in the control group than those who were given product definitions that included benefits. By applying hybrid methods, this study showed that consumers could respond positively towards products containing seafood by-products accompanied by information about environmental or health benefits. There is great potential for consumer education about empowered choices of food and nutrition supplements that are environmentally friendly at the ingredient level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125487

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioactives can be obtained from fish and shellfish processing and from seaweeds.

    “In the marine sector, bioactives could be obtained from fish and shellfish processing, as well as from seaweeds [65,142,143].”

    From Use of Waste from the Food Industry and Applications of the Fermentation Process to Create Sustainable Cosmetic Products: A Review (2024) · cites this paper as [143]

    The Introduction says that fisheries and shellfish by-product biomass contains fats, proteins, minerals and biopolymers with potential use in valuable products. This supports obtaining useful ingredients from fishery and shellfish waste, but the passages do not address seaweeds or explicitly identify those ingredients as bioactives (searched: seaweed, algae, bioactives). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altintzoglou, T., Honkanen, P., & Whitaker, R. D.
Affiliations
Nofima (NO)
Corresponding author
Altintzoglou, Themistoklis
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
285
Pages
125487
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111610879
Cited by
73
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commissions’ Seventh Framework Programme (604814)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
food waste reduction, consumer involvement, consumer attitudes, seafood by-products, sustainable products, consumer personality, dietary supplements, cosmetics, processed foods, environmental benefits, health benefits, consumer education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review