Cited by 279Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorEating Disorders and Behaviors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food rejections in children: Cognitive and social/environmental factors involved in food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior

Open access

Abstract

Food neophobia and picky/fussy eating behavior are presented as the two main forms of children's food rejections which are responsible for a reduction of their dietary repertoire. We review the key factors, presented in the literature, that are involved in food rejections during childhood. We first consider a range of "cognitive factors", such as food perception, mental representations, categorization of food items, and emotions and feelings toward food. Next we focus on "social and environmental factors", as these might also significantly influence and modulate children's food rejections. We then summarize the findings to provide a comprehensive view of the factors involved in children's food rejections. Finally, we discuss the need for future studies on food rejections, regarding (i) the distinction between food neophobia and picky/fussy eating, and (ii) the potential link between food categorization abilities and children's food neophobia and pickiness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.008

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 184 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–279 of 279

Metadata

Authors
Lafraire, J., Rioux, C., Giboreau, A., & Picard, D.
Affiliations
  • Institut Paul Bocuse (FR)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Lafraire, Jérémie
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
96
Issue
234
Pages
347-357
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1773621283
Cited by
279
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
food neophobia, picky eating, food perception, food categorization
MeSH terms
Child, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review