Cited by 443Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer behavior in food and health

Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers

Open access
Kushwah, Shiksha, Dhir, Amandeep, Sagar, Mahim, Gupta, Bhumika·2019·Appetite

Abstract

During the last few decades, interest in organically produced food has steadily risen around the world. Consequently, academic interest in better understanding the different motives and barriers underlying organic food consumption has also increased. But, the scope of these published studies is both broad and fragmented. There is a lack of research that systematically examines and presents a comprehensive review of the different motives and barriers and their association with purchase decisions. The current study shows a systematic literature review of different motives and barriers and their association with purchase decisions in context to organic food. A total of 89 empirical studies was considered in the review. Two popular theoretical frameworks, namely the theory of consumption values and innovation resistance theory, were used to categorize the identified motives and barriers. The primary outcomes of this systematic literature review are: a) descriptive statistics on the selected studies; b) comprehensive summary of motives and barriers mentioned in selected studies using theory of consumption values and innovation resistance theory; c) classification of motives and barriers on consumer involvement, research design and country status; d) framework on the association between motives, barriers and purchase decisions; e) implications for scholars, managers, and policymakers interested in better understanding issues related to organic food consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104402

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., Sagar, M., & Gupta, B.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Institut Mines-Télécom Business School (FR)
Corresponding author
Kushwah, Shiksha
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
143
Pages
104402
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968010768
Cited by
443
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
organic food consumption, consumer motivation, barriers to consumption, purchase decision, theory of consumption values, innovation resistance theory, consumer involvement, sustainable food consumption
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Adult, Choice Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Female, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Motivation, Taste, Food, Organic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review