Cited by 106Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Susceptibility to increased high energy dense sweet and savoury food intake in response to the COVID-19 lockdown: The role of craving control and acceptance coping strategies

Open access
Buckland, Nicola J., Swinnerton, Lucy F., Ng, Kwok, Price, Menna, Wilkinson, Laura L., Myers, Anna, Dalton, Michelle·2021·Appetite

Abstract

Emerging evidence indicates that for some people, the COVID-19 lockdowns are a time of high risk for increased food intake. A clearer understanding of which individuals are most at risk of over-eating during the lockdown period is needed to inform interventions that promote healthy diets and prevent weight gain during lockdowns. An online survey collected during the COVID-19 lockdown (total n = 875; analysed n = 588; 33.4 ± 12.6 years; 82% UK-based; mostly white, educated, and not home schooling) investigated reported changes to the amount consumed and changes to intake of high energy dense (HED) sweet and savoury foods. The study also assessed which eating behaviour traits predicted a reported increase of HED sweet and savoury foods and tested whether coping responses moderated this relationship. Results showed that 48% of participants reported increased food intake in response to the COVID-19 lockdown. There was large individual variability in reported changes and lower craving control was the strongest predictor of increased HED sweet and savoury food intake. Low cognitive restraint also predicted greater increases in HED sweet snacks and HED savoury meal foods. Food responsiveness, enjoyment of food, emotional undereating, emotional overeating and satiety responsiveness were not significant predictors of changes to HED sweet and savoury food intake. High scores on acceptance coping responses attenuated the conditional effects of craving control on HED sweet snack intake. Consistent with previous findings, the current research suggests that low craving control is a risk factor for increased snack food intake during lockdown and may therefore represent a target for intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105017

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence from the early stages of the pandemic suggests that adults with overweight and obesity were vulnerable to weight gain and changes in eating behaviour (e.g., increased emotional eating).

    “Evidence from the early stages of the pandemic also suggests that adults with overweight and obesity were vulnerable to weight gain and changes in eating behaviour (e.g., increased emotional eating) [9–11].”

    From Supporting Weight Management during COVID-19 (SWiM-C): twelve-month follow-up of a randomised controlled trial of a web-based, ACT-based, guided self-help intervention (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that 48% of surveyed adults increased food intake during lockdown, and the Introduction describes a risk of weight gain in susceptible individuals. But the Results (page unavailable) found no significant association between BMI and changes in food intake; the study therefore does not establish particular vulnerability among adults with overweight or obesity. Emotional overeating was not a significant predictor of intake changes, and the study did not measure weight gain. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckland, N. J., Swinnerton, L. F., Ng, K., Price, M., Wilkinson, L. L., Myers, A., & Dalton, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • Leeds Trinity University (GB)
Corresponding author
Buckland, Nicola J.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
158
Pages
105017
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097489325
Cited by
106
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, dietary intake, sweet snacks, acceptance coping, cognitive restraint, emotional overeating, emotional undereating, food responsiveness, satiety responsiveness, food enjoyment, weight gain prevention, individual susceptibility
MeSH terms
Physical Distancing, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Energy Intake, Communicable Disease Control, Eating, Emotions, Female, Food Preferences, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quarantine, Retrospective Studies, Satiety Response, Social Isolation, Taste, Young Adult, Pandemics, Snacks, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review