Cited by 42Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Can you spare 15 min? The measurable positive impact of a 15-min petting session on shelter dog well-being

Open access
McGowan, Ragen T.S., Bolte, Cynthia, Barnett, Hallie R., Perez-Camargo, Gerardo, Martin, François·2018·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Abstract

It is well established that human interaction has positive effects on shelter dogs. This work set out to answer the question: “Does one 15-min petting session make a difference for shelter dogs?” Fifty-five dogs were subject to one 15-min petting session with one of five unfamiliar volunteers, in an observation room at a county animal shelter. Volunteers were instructed to interact with dogs in a controlled manner. Sessions were video recorded for later analysis of dog behavior. Saliva was collected before and after the session to assess change in cortisol concentrations. Cardiac activity was monitored throughout the session. Dog response to the interaction session was variable, but generally positive. Dogs were categorized into one of three interaction categories based on the amount of time they spent in actual physical contact with the volunteer: highly engaged (>75%), moderately engaged (50–75%) or indifferent (<50%). Generalized Linear Mixed models were used to assess changes in behavior or physiology from beginning (minutes 2 & 3) to end (minutes 14 & 15) of the session and also changes in salivary cortisol concentrations from pre- to post-session. There was no significant change in salivary cortisol concentrations (P > 0.05) from pre- to post- session. However, when comparing cardiac activity and behavior from the first two minutes to the last two minutes of the session, dogs had a decrease in heart rate (P < 0.0001), an increase in heart rate variability (HF: P = 0.0006, RMSSD: P = 0.0365, pNN50: P < 0.0001) and changes in behavior (decreases in soliciting contact P = 0.0124, standing P = 0.0225) associated with a positive state of relaxation. Given the results of this study it appears that the answer is: “Yes, 15 min does make a positive difference” for many shelter dogs when that time includes close interaction with a person petting and speaking to them in a calm manner.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.02.011

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Broom, D.M., Johnson, K.G., 1993. Stress and Animal Welfare. Springer Sciences & Business Media.
  2. Hennessy, M.B., 2013. Using hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal measures for assessing and reducing the stress of dogs in shelters: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 149, 1-12.
  3. Horvath, Z., Igyarto, B.-Z., Magyar, A., Miklosi, A., 2007. Three different copying styles in police dogs exposed to a short-term challenge. Horm. Behav. 52 (5), 621-630.
  4. Jones, A.C., Gosling, S.D., 2005. Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): a review and evaluation of past research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 95 (1-2), 1-53.
  5. Kirschbaum, C., Hellhammer, D.H., 1994. Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine re- search: recent developments and applications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 19 (4), 313-333.
  6. Kirschbaum, C., Hellhammer, D.H., 2000. Salivary cortisol. In: In: Fink, G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Stress, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, pp. 379-383.
  7. Kobelt, A.J., Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L., Butler, K.L., 2003. Sources of sampling variation in saliva cortisol in dogs. Res. Vet. Sci. 75 (2), 157-161.
  8. Mendel, C.M., 1989. The free hormone hypothesis: a physiologically based mathematical model. Endocr. Rev. 10 (3), 232-274.
  9. Nicolson, N.A., 2007. Measurement of cortisol. In: Luecken, L.J., Gallo, L.C. (Eds.), Handbook of Physiological Research Methods in Health Psychology. Sage Publications, Inc., pp. 37-74.
  10. Pop, D., Rusu, A.S., Pop-Vancia, V., Papuc, I., Constantinescu, R., Miresan, V., 2014. Physiological effects of human-animal positive interaction in dogs-review of the literature. Bull. UASVM Anim. Sci. Biotechol. 71, 102-110.
  11. Valderas, M.T., Bolea, J., Laguna, P., Vallverdú, M., Bailón, R., 2015. Human emotion recognition using heart rate variability analysis with spectral bands based on re- spiration. 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 6134-6137.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGowan, R. T. S., Bolte, C., Barnett, H. R., Perez-Camargo, G., & Martin, F.
Affiliations
Nestlé (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
McGowan, Ragen T.S.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
203
Pages
42-54
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790055455
Cited by
42
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
shelter dogs, petting, human-dog interaction, salivary cortisol, heart rate, heart rate variability, dog behavior, relaxation, animal shelters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review