Cited by 23Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesIcing and De-icing TechnologiesSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

Frosting behavior of louvered-fin and tube heat exchanger after surface treatment: Experimental analysis

Ye, Zhenhong, Shi, Junye, Chen, Jiangping·2021·Applied Thermal Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117066

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ye, Z., Shi, J., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Jiangping
Venue
Applied Thermal Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
194
Pages
117066
ISSN
1359-4311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163929150
Cited by
23
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Thermal Engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Icing and De-icing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Keywords
frost formation, hydrophobic surface treatment, louvered fin heat exchanger, heat pump evaporator, classical nucleation theory, subcooling, refrigerant flow rate, air pressure drop, surface modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review