Cited by 320Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: Effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza

Abstract

Greenhouse gas mitigation options include the production of carbonized materials and their addition to soils for longer term storage. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a novel way to produce carbonized materials. The goal here was to test if HTC material, in our case derived from beet root chips, has adverse effects on plant growth or that of root associated symbionts such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. We carried out several studies, and found that increasing concentrations of HTC material could be deleterious for plant growth of Taraxacum, starting at 10vol% additions. Conversely, root colonization of the fungal symbiont was stimulated at an addition of 20vol%. Soil pH changes occurring during the study could be traced to microbial reduction reactions, and these led to a pH increase of the medium despite the quite acidic nature of the HTC material itself. In separate assays, we showed that spore germination of the AM fungus Glomus intraradices was stimulated by the HTC material, suggesting that direct effects on the fungi are likely in addition to those mediated by the host plant. A third experiment with a different plant species (Trifolium repens) confirmed the major conclusions, and showed also neutral to stimulatory effect on nodulation. Our results suggest that HTC materials should be carefully tested and optimized to reduce negative effects on plant growth before applications in the field are undertaken, particularly at high addition rates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.011

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Rillig, M. C., Wagner, M., Salem, M., Antunes, P. M., George, C., Ramke, H.-G., Titirici, M.-M., & Antonietti, M.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Ostwestfalen-Lippe University of Applied Sciences and Arts (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Rillig, Matthias C.
Venue
Applied Soil Ecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
238-242
ISSN
0929-1393 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138213853
Cited by
320
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
22.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Soil Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt
  • Freie Universität Berlin
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
hydrothermal carbonization, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant growth, soil amendment, soil pH, microbial reduction, Glomus intraradices, spore germination, root colonization, white clover, nodulation, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, soil carbon storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review