Cited by 17Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsChronic Disease Management Strategies

Impact of a primary-based telemonitoring programme in HRQOL, satisfaction and usefulness in a sample of older adults with chronic diseases in Valencia (Spain)

Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión, Ródenas, Francisco, Garcés, Jorge·2016·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Background Chronic patients are frequent users of healthcare services and are prone to hospital admissions. In Valencia (Spain) the Valcronic programme aims to manage chronic patients through different levels of telemonitoring and telecare. This paper examines the impact of the Valcronic programme on self-perceived HRQOL in a one-year period and on perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness in a sample of older adults with chronic diseases.Methods The sample (n=74) was randomly selected from Valcronic users and was stratified considering different variables. HRQOL was assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire at two points in time: before the beginning of the Valcronic programme and after a one-year follow-up. Satisfaction and usefulness were evaluated one year after users' inclusion.Results The whole sample experienced improvement, although not significant, of its HRQOL; patients over 75 showed impairment. Patients with at least one problem in the EQ-5D dimensions decreased after one year (82.43% vs. 74.32%). Users' perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness were highly positive.Conclusions Our sample benefited from the Valcronic programme, experiencing an improvement in their HRQOL, a decreased use of health resources or high satisfaction levels.Implications Further adjustments are needed to address a comprehensive response to the needs of the global population of reference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2015.09.008

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doñate-Martínez, A., Ródenas, F., & Garcés, J.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Doñate-Martínez, Ascensión
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
62
Pages
169-175
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1759461051
Cited by
17
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health of Valencia
  • Valencian Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
remote patient monitoring, chronic disease, older adults, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, perceived usefulness, telecare, EQ-5D, health care utilization, hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Spain, Telemetry, Program Evaluation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review