Cited by 40Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and HealthSports Performance and Training

Effects of high-intensity interval and continuous moderate aerobic training on fitness and health markers of older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Oliveira, Adriano, Fidalgo, Andressa, Farinatti, Paulo, Monteiro, Walace·2024·Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics

Abstract

Background High-intensity interval training (HIIT) promotes similar or superior gains in physical fitness and health compared to continuous moderate-intensity training (MICT) in young individuals. However, the effectiveness of HIIT in older adults is uncertain. Objective This meta-analysis compared the effects of HIIT and MICT on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, vascular, metabolic, and hormonal variables, cognitive function, and quality of life in older adults. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and SportDiscus databases were searched from inception until December 2023. Trials included adults ≥ 60 y. Hedge's effect sizes (g) were calculated and study quality and features of training interventions were tested as moderators. Results Twenty-nine trials including 1,227 subjects (65.4 ± 3.3 y). HIIT and MICT elicited significant (p 0.156) 'gs' for VO 2max (0.722 vs. 0.490), maximal workload/peak power output ratio (0.290 vs. 0.372),% fat (-0.297 vs. -0.262), glycemia (-0.273 vs. -0.334), systolic (-0.465 vs. -0.341), and diastolic blood pressure (-0.566 vs. -2.311). HIIT (p 0.170) produced significant 'gs' for fat mass (-0.245 vs. -0.103), waist circumference (-0.239 vs. -0.116), testosterone (0.339 vs. 0.170), and complex Stroop test (-0.595 vs. -0.250). Increases in the VO 2max occurred only in controlled trials after HIIT but not MICT (Q = 6.286, p = 0.012; HITT-g = 1.068, p Conclusion HIIT and MICT produced similar changes in most of the inv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105451

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, A., Fidalgo, A., Farinatti, P., & Monteiro, W.
Affiliations
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Corresponding author
Monteiro, Walace
Venue
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
124
Pages
105451
ISSN
0167-4943 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395006016
Cited by
36
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
high-intensity interval training, older adults, cardiorespiratory fitness, VO2max, body composition, fat mass, glycemia, blood pressure, testosterone, cognitive function, quality of life, exercise training effects, Stroop task, peak power, waist circumference, health indicators
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, High-Intensity Interval Training, Aged, Body Composition, Cognition, Humans, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Quality of Life, Biomarkers, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review