Cited by 359Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

Post stroke depression and risk of stroke recurrence and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cai, Wa, Mueller, Christoph, Li, Yi-Jing, Shen, Wei-Dong, Stewart, Robert·2019·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Background Post stroke depression is a significant neuropsychiatric manifestation, predicting a range of poor outcomes. There are several studies investigating the association between post stroke depression and stroke recurrence/mortality, but results have been inconsistent.Objective A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta regression of observational studies assessing the association between post stroke depression and risk of stroke recurrence and mortality.Methods A search of Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science databases, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted until August 2018. We extracted and pooled hazard ratios from observational studies that reported the risk estimates of stroke recurrence and mortality in stroke survivors with/without depression.Results The reviewed sample comprised 15 prospective cohort studies with 250,294 participants, 139,276 cases, and follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 15 years. The meta-analysis concluded a hazard ratio for post stroke depression and all-cause mortality of 1.59 (95% CI, 1.30-1.96), but research to date has been insufficient to determine the association between post stroke depression and stroke recurrence.Conclusion and relevance Post stroke depression is associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality in stroke survivors. More researches are required on the association with stroke recurrence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2019.01.013

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, W., Mueller, C., Li, Y.-J., Shen, W.-D., & Stewart, R.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shen, Wei-Dong
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
50
Pages
102-109
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911941199
Cited by
359
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Graduate innovation training program, Shanghai University of traditional Chinese Medicine (Y201805)
  • Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (16401970402/18401970601)
  • Three-year action plan for the development of Traditional Chinese medicine, Shanghai, China (ZYSNXD-CC-HPGC-JD-014)
  • Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, China (ZYKC201701001)
  • National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King's College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
post-stroke depression, stroke recurrence, stroke mortality, stroke survivors, all-cause mortality
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Mortality, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stroke, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review