The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformer-based deep learning models for the sentiment analysis of social media data
Open accessAbstract
Sentiment analysis (SA) is a widely used contextual mining technique for extracting useful and subjective information from text-based data. It applies on Natural Language Processing (NLP), text analysis, biometrics, and computational linguistics to identify, analyse, and extract responses, states, or emotions from the data. The features analysis technique plays a significant role in the development and improvement of a SA model. Recently, GloVe and Word2vec embedding models have been widely used for feature extractions. However, they overlook sentimental and contextual information of the text and need a large corpus of text data for training and generating exact vectors. These techniques generate vectors for just those words that are included in their vocabulary and ignore Out of Vocabulary Words (OOV), which can lead to information loss. Another challenge for the classification of sentiments is that of the lack of readily available annotated data. Sometimes, there is a contradiction between the review and their label that may cause misclassification. The aim of this paper is to propose a generalized SA model that can handle noisy data, OOV words, sentimental and contextual loss of reviews data. In this research, an effective Bi-directional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) based Convolution Bi-directional Recurrent Neural Network (CBRNN) model is proposed with for exploring the syntactic and semantic information along with the sentimental and contextual analysis of the data. Initially, the zero-shot classification is used for labelling the reviews by calculating their polarity scores. After that, a pre-trained BERT model is employed for obtaining sentence-level semantics and contextual features from that data and generate embeddings. The obtained contextual embedded vectors were then passed to the neural network, comprised of dilated convolution and Bi-LSTM. The proposed model uses dilated convolution instead of classical convolution to extract local and global contextual semantic features from the embedded data. Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) is used for the entire sequencing of the sentences. The CBRNN model is evaluated across four diverse domain text datasets based on accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score and AUC values. Thus, CBRNN can be efficiently used for performing SA tasks on social media reviews, without any information loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533
Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00051 · Cited by 9,645
Multi-scale context aggregation by dilated convolutions
Yu, F., & Koltun, V. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.07122 · Cited by 7,738
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1146 · Cited by 1,181
Japanese and Korean voice search
Schuster, M., & Nakajima, K. (2012) · 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2012.6289079 · Cited by 862
Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data
Alaei, A. R., Becken, S., & Stantic, B. (2019) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287517747753 · Cited by 622
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Khan, S. K., & Prasad, M. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3434237 · Cited by 194
A survey of word embeddings based on deep learning
Wang, S., Zhou, W., & Jiang, C. (2020) · Computing · doi:10.1007/s00607-019-00768-7 · Cited by 193
Cited by
A Survey of Sentiment Analysis: Approaches, Datasets, and Future Research
Tan, K. L., Lee, C. P., & Lim, K. M. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13074550 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabinda Kokab, S., Asghar, S., & Naz, S.
- Venue
- Array
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 100157
- ISSN
- 2590-0056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4223591627
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 14.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.