Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transformer-based deep learning models for the sentiment analysis of social media data

Open access
Tabinda Kokab, Sayyida, Asghar, Sohail, Naz, Shehneela·2022·Array

Abstract

Sentiment analysis (SA) is a widely used contextual mining technique for extracting useful and subjective information from text-based data. It applies on Natural Language Processing (NLP), text analysis, biometrics, and computational linguistics to identify, analyse, and extract responses, states, or emotions from the data. The features analysis technique plays a significant role in the development and improvement of a SA model. Recently, GloVe and Word2vec embedding models have been widely used for feature extractions. However, they overlook sentimental and contextual information of the text and need a large corpus of text data for training and generating exact vectors. These techniques generate vectors for just those words that are included in their vocabulary and ignore Out of Vocabulary Words (OOV), which can lead to information loss. Another challenge for the classification of sentiments is that of the lack of readily available annotated data. Sometimes, there is a contradiction between the review and their label that may cause misclassification. The aim of this paper is to propose a generalized SA model that can handle noisy data, OOV words, sentimental and contextual loss of reviews data. In this research, an effective Bi-directional Encoder Representation from Transformers (BERT) based Convolution Bi-directional Recurrent Neural Network (CBRNN) model is proposed with for exploring the syntactic and semantic information along with the sentimental and contextual analysis of the data. Initially, the zero-shot classification is used for labelling the reviews by calculating their polarity scores. After that, a pre-trained BERT model is employed for obtaining sentence-level semantics and contextual features from that data and generate embeddings. The obtained contextual embedded vectors were then passed to the neural network, comprised of dilated convolution and Bi-LSTM. The proposed model uses dilated convolution instead of classical convolution to extract local and global contextual semantic features from the embedded data. Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) is used for the entire sequencing of the sentences. The CBRNN model is evaluated across four diverse domain text datasets based on accuracy, precision, recall, f1-score and AUC values. Thus, CBRNN can be efficiently used for performing SA tasks on social media reviews, without any information loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.array.2022.100157

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Tabinda Kokab, S., Asghar, S., & Naz, S.
Venue
Array
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
14
Pages
100157
ISSN
2590-0056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223591627
Cited by
237
References
10
FWCI
14.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.