Cited by 1Aging, Health, and DisabilityPhysical Activity and HealthMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Therapeutic Exercise With Psychological Interventions on Disability and Personal Outcomes in Older Adults

Open access
Rose, Grace A., Bruni, Pietra T., Wingood, Mariana, Kallmi, Selmi, Finer, Elizabeth, Bamonti, Patricia M.·2025·Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of therapeutic exercise and psychological interventions on disability and personal outcomes in older adults. Data Sources: Articles published from January 2013 to February 2025 are available in PubMed, Embase, ProQuest Health & Medical and Psychology, PsycINFO, and PsycArticles. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) intervention included therapeutic exercise combined or integrated with a psychological intervention; (2) randomized controlled trial; (3) sample mean age ≥60 years; (4) primary or secondary outcome(s) of disability. Two authors independently screened trials (n=7391) for inclusion; a third author verified results and resolved discrepancies. Data Extraction: Data were extracted by a primary reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials. Data Synthesis: Thirty-eight trials (n=18,550 participants) were included. Therapeutic exercise included: exercise programs (34%), physical activity counseling and monitoring (37%), rehabilitation (18%), or other (eg, Tai Chi; 13%). Psychological interventions were primarily motivational interviewing (53%) or cognitive-behavioral therapy/strategies (39%). Significant improvement in body functions and structures (n=14, 37%), activity (n=6, 16%), participation (n=20, 53%), and personal factors (n=11, 29%) was observed. Conclusions: Therapeutic exercise with psychological interventions have a positive effect on disability and personal outcomes, especially in participation. Heterogeneity in the study design, intervention, and population challenged data synthesis. Nonetheless, the current review identified gaps within the literature and directions for future research. Testing the additive effect of these interventions compared to active comparators is a priority for future investigations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arrct.2025.100447

Cites

66 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research examining the effectiveness of psychological and non-pharmacological interventions remains limited, as no clear emphasis on such approaches was apparent in the findings.

    “Also, research examining the effectiveness of psychological and non-pharmacological interventions remains limited, as no clear emphasis on such approaches was apparent in the findings [97,98].”

    From Toward Holistic Aging in Lebanon: A Mapping of Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions (2026) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Discussion (Future directions; page unavailable) calls for more trials comparing combined exercise-and-psychological interventions with either intervention alone, supporting a limited need for further effectiveness research. But the broad claim that research lacks a clear emphasis on psychological and non-pharmacological approaches is not supported: the Abstract (Data Synthesis; page unavailable) reports 38 trials focused on those approaches and significant improvements in several outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, G. A., Bruni, P. T., Wingood, M., Kallmi, S., Finer, E., & Bamonti, P. M.
Affiliations
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rose, Grace A.
Venue
Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
100447
ISSN
2590-1095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408597496
Cited by
0
References
65
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
exercise therapy, psychological intervention, older adults, disability, participation, activity, physiological function, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy, Tai Chi, physical activity counseling, rehabilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review