Cited by 257Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and careHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Enhancing Cardiac Rehabilitation With Stress Management Training: A Randomized, Clinical Efficacy Trial

Open access
Blumenthal, James A., Sherwood, Andrew, Smith, Patrick J., Watkins, Lana, Mabe, Stephanie, Kraus, William E., Ingle, Krista, Miller, Paula +1 more·2016·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is the standard of care for patients with coronary heart disease. Despite considerable epidemiological evidence that high stress is associated with worse health outcomes, stress management training (SMT) is not included routinely as a component of CR. Methods and Results—: One hundred fifty-one outpatients with coronary heart disease who were 36 to 84 years of age were randomized to 12 weeks of comprehensive CR or comprehensive CR combined with SMT (CR+SMT), with assessments of stress and coronary heart disease biomarkers obtained before and after treatment. A matched sample of CR-eligible patients who did not receive CR made up the no-CR comparison group. All participants were followed up for up to 5.3 years (median, 3.2 years) for clinical events. Patients randomized to CR+SMT exhibited greater reductions in composite stress levels compared with those randomized to CR alone ( P =0.022), an effect that was driven primarily by improvements in anxiety, distress, and perceived stress. Both CR groups achieved significant, and comparable, improvements in coronary heart disease biomarkers. Participants in the CR+SMT group exhibited lower rates of clinical events compared with those in the CR-alone group (18% versus 33%; hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.95; P =0.035), and both CR groups had lower event rates compared with the no-CR group (47%; hazard ratio=0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.27–0.71; P <0.001). Conclusions—: CR enhanced by SMT produced significant reductions in stress and greater improvements in medical outcomes compared with standard CR. Our findings indicate that SMT may provide incremental benefit when combined with comprehensive CR and suggest that SMT should be incorporated routinely into CR. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00981253.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018926

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blumenthal, J. A., Sherwood, A., Smith, P. J., Watkins, L., Mabe, S., Kraus, W. E., Ingle, K., Miller, P., & Hinderliter, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Circulation
Published
2016-04-05
Volume
133
Issue
14
Pages
1341-1350
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2304409582
Cited by
257
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 6
FWCI
20.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL093374, HL093374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
cardiac rehabilitation, stress management training, coronary artery disease, psychological stress, anxiety, perceived stress, clinical events, outpatients
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina, Unstable, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Coronary Disease, Counseling, Exercise Test, Female, Humans, Lipids, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Psychotherapy, Group, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Proportional Hazards Models, Single-Blind Method, Baroreflex, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review