Cited by 34Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Cardiorespiratory fitness estimation in free-living using wearable sensors

Altini, Marco, Casale, Pierluigi, Penders, Julien, Amft, Oliver·2016·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Objective In this paper we propose artificial intelligence methods to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in free-living using wearable sensor data.Methods Our methods rely on a computational framework able to contextualize heart rate (HR) in free-living, and use context-specific HR as predictor of CRF without need for laboratory tests. In particular, we propose three estimation steps. Initially, we recognize activity primitives using accelerometer and location data. Using topic models, we group activity primitives and derive activities composites. We subsequently rank activity composites, and analyze the relation between ranked activity composites and CRF across individuals. Finally, HR data in specific activity primitives and composites is used as predictor in a hierarchical Bayesian regression model to estimate CRF level from the participant's habitual behavior in free-living.Results We show that by combining activity primitives and activity composites the proposed framework can adapt to the user and context, and outperforms other CRF estimation models, reducing estimation error between 10.3% and 22.6% on a study population of 46 participants.Conclusions Our investigation showed that HR can be contextualized in free-living using activity primitives and activity composites and robust CRF estimation in free-living is feasible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.02.002

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite some promising studies which attempt to infer VO2max from data collected during free-living conditions, these mostly stem from small-scale cohorts with less than 50 participants and use contextual data from treadmill activity, which again limits their application in real-world contexts.

    “Despite some promising studies which attempt to infer VO2max from data collected during free-living conditions, these mostly stem from small-scale cohorts with less than 50 participants and use contextual data from treadmill activity, which again limits their application in real-world contexts [150].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altini, M., Casale, P., Penders, J., & Amft, O.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Imec the Netherlands (NL)
  • University of Passau (DE)
Corresponding author
Altini, Marco
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
68
Pages
37-46
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2284544053
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
wearable sensors, heart rate, activity recognition, topic modeling, Bayesian hierarchical model, accelerometer, location data, habitual behavior
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Adult, Artificial Intelligence, Female, Humans, Male, Biosensing Techniques, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review