Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 538

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AI-assisted CT imaging analysis for COVID-19 screening: Building and deploying a medical AI system

Open access
Wang, Bo, Jin, Shuo, Yan, Qingsen, Xu, Haibo, Luo, Chuan, Wei, Lai, Zhao, Wei, Hou, Xuexue, Ma, Wenshuo, Xu, Zhengqing, Zheng, Zhuozhao, Sun, Wenbo, Lan, Lan, Zhang, Wei, Mu, Xiangdong, Shi, Chenxi, Wang, Zhongxiao, Lee, Jihae, Jin, Zijian, Lin, Minggui, Jin, Hongbo, Zhang, Liang, Guo, Jun, Zhao, Benqi, Ren, Zhizhong, Wang, Shuhao, Xu, Wei, Wang, Xinghuan, Wang, Jianming, You, Zheng, Dong, Jiahong·2021·Applied Soft Computing

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The sudden outbreak of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) increased the diagnostic burden of radiologists. In the time of an epidemic crisis, we hope artificial intelligence (AI) to reduce physician workload in regions with the outbreak, and improve the diagnosis accuracy for physicians before they could acquire enough experience with the new disease. In this paper, we present our experience in building and deploying an AI system that automatically analyzes CT images and provides the probability of infection to rapidly detect COVID-19 pneumonia. The proposed system which consists of classification and segmentation will save about 30%–40% of the detection time for physicians and promote the performance of COVID-19 detection. Specifically, working in an interdisciplinary team of over 30 people with medical and/or AI background, geographically distributed in Beijing and Wuhan, we are able to overcome a series of challenges (e.g. data discrepancy, testing time-effectiveness of model, data security, etc.) in this particular situation and deploy the system in four weeks. In addition, since the proposed AI system provides the priority of each CT image with probability of infection, the physicians can confirm and segregate the infected patients in time. Using 1,136 training cases (723 positives for COVID-19) from five hospitals, we are able to achieve a sensitivity of 0.974 and specificity of 0.922 on the test dataset, which included a variety of pulmonary diseases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106897

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Graham, 2013, A decade after SARS: strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 11, 836, 10.1038/nrmicro3143 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chen, 2020, Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records, Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30360-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Pan, 2020, Time course of lung changes on chest CT during recovery from 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia, Radiology, 10.1148/radiol.2020200370 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ai, 2020, Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases, Radiology, 10.1148/radiol.2020200642 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lee, 2020, COVID-19 pneumonia: what has CT taught us?, Lancet Infect. Dis., 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30134-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ji, 2020, Potential association between COVID-19 mortality and health-care resource availability, Lancet Glob. Health, 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30068-1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Wang, 2020, Precise pulmonary scanning and reducing medical radiation exposure by developing a clinically applicable intelligent CT system: Toward improving patient care, EBioMedicine, 54, 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102724 · DOI
  8. Yan, 2019, Two-stream convolutional networks for blind image quality assessment, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 28, 2200, 10.1109/TIP.2018.2883741 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Yan, 2020, Deep HDR imaging via a non-local network, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 29, 4308, 10.1109/TIP.2020.2971346 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Yan, 2020, Ghost removal via channel attention in exposure fusion, Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 201, 10.1016/j.cviu.2020.103079 · DOI
  11. Q. Yan, D. Gong, P. Zhang, Q. Shi, J. Sun, I. Reid, Y. Zhang, Multi-scale dense networks for deep high dynamic range imaging, in: IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 41–50. · DOI
  12. Cao, 2020, Longitudinal assessment of COVID-19 using a deep learning–based quantitative CT pipeline: Illustration of two cases, Radiol.: Cardiothorac. Imaging, 2
  13. Huang, 2020, Serial quantitative chest CT assessment of COVID-19: Deep-learning approach, Radiol.: Cardiothorac. Imaging, 2
  14. He, 2015, Deep residual learning for image recognition, Comput. Sci.
  15. Lehmann, 1999, Survey: Interpolation methods in medical image processing, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 18, 1049, 10.1109/42.816070 · DOI · Paper page
  16. J. Long, E. Shelhamer, T. Darrell, Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015, pp. 3431–3440. · DOI · Paper page
  17. C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015, pp. 1–9. · DOI · Paper page
  18. A. Paszke, S. Gross, S. Chintala, G. Chanan, E. Yang, Z. DeVito, Z. Lin, A. Desmaison, L. Antiga, A. Lerer, Automatic differentiation in PyTorch, in: NIPS Workshop, 2017.

Cited by

See all 538

Metadata

Authors
Wang, B., Jin, S., Yan, Q., Xu, H., Luo, C., Wei, L., Zhao, W., Hou, X., Ma, W., Xu, Z., Zheng, Z., Sun, W., Lan, L., Zhang, W., Mu, X., Shi, C., Wang, Z., Lee, J., Jin, Z., Lin, M., Jin, H., Zhang, L., Guo, J., Zhao, B., Ren, Z., Wang, S., Xu, W., Wang, X., Wang, J., You, Z., & Dong, J.
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
98
Pages
106897
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3102469298
Cited by
538
References
11
FWCI
50.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61532001)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC0845500)
  • Tsinghua Initiative Scientific Research Program (20151080475)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AI-assisted CT imaging analysis for COVID-19 screening: Building and deploying a medical AI system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106897
The paper
Wang, B., Jin, S., Yan, Q., Xu, H., Luo, C., Wei, L., Zhao, W., Hou, X., Ma, W., Xu, Z., Zheng, Z., Sun, W., Lan, L., Zhang, W., Mu, X., Shi, C., Wang, Z., Lee, J., Jin, Z., . . . Dong, J. (2021). AI-assisted CT imaging analysis for COVID-19 screening: Building and deploying a medical AI system. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106897

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.