Cited by 273Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFire effects on ecosystemsAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Bottom-up estimate of biomass burning in mainland China

Yan, Xiaoyuan, Ohara, Toshimasa, Akimoto, Hajime·2006·Atmospheric Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.040

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, X., Ohara, T., & Akimoto, H.
Affiliations
  • Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JP)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Yan, Xiaoyuan
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
40
Issue
27
Pages
5262-5273
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972865823
Cited by
273
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 20
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Atmospheric Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Keywords
biomass burning, carbon monoxide emissions, crop residue burning, forest fires, grassland fires, emission factors, emission inventory uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review