The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation
Open accessAbstract
In the paper a novel hybrid model combining air mass trajectory analysis and wavelet transformation to improve the artificial neural network (ANN) forecast accuracy of daily average concentrations of PM2.5 two days in advance is presented. The model was developed from 13 different air pollution monitoring stations in Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei province (Jing-Jin-Ji area). The air mass trajectory was used to recognize distinct corridors for transport of “dirty” air and “clean” air to selected stations. With each corridor, a triangular station net was constructed based on air mass trajectories and the distances between neighboring sites. Wind speed and direction were also considered as parameters in calculating this trajectory based air pollution indicator value. Moreover, the original time series of PM2.5 concentration was decomposed by wavelet transformation into a few sub-series with lower variability. The prediction strategy applied to each of them and then summed up the individual prediction results. Daily meteorological forecast variables as well as the respective pollutant predictors were used as input to a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) type of back-propagation neural network. The experimental verification of the proposed model was conducted over a period of more than one year (between September 2013 and October 2014). It is found that the trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation can be effective tools to improve the PM2.5 forecasting accuracy. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of the hybrid model can be reduced, on the average, by up to 40 percent. Particularly, the high PM2.5 days are almost anticipated by using wavelet decomposition and the detection rate (DR) for a given alert threshold of hybrid model can reach 90% on average. This approach shows the potential to be applied in other countries’ air quality forecasting systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daubechies, I. (1992) · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970104 · Cited by 15,979
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Cited by
Environmental determinants of cardiovascular disease: lessons learned from air pollution
Al-Kindi, S. G., Brook, R. D., Biswal, S., & Rajagopalan, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0371-2 · Cited by 782
A Deep CNN-LSTM Model for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Forecasting in Smart Cities
Huang, C.-J., & Kuo, P.-H. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18072220 · Cited by 705
Qi, Y., Li, Q., Karimian, H., & Liu, D. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.333 · Cited by 601
Self-citationA review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction
Cabaneros, S. M., Calautit, J. K., & Hughes, B. R. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.014 · Cited by 459
Pak, U., Ma, J., Ryu, U., Ryom, K., Juhyok, U., Pak, K., & Pak, C. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.367 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, X., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Jin, L., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 118-128
- ISSN
- 1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968840994
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.030
- The paper
- Feng, X., Li, Q., Zhu, Y., Hou, J., Jin, L., & Wang, J. (2015). Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.