Cited by 65Planetary Science and ExplorationSpace Exploration and TechnologySpace exploration and regulation

Leveraging in situ resources for lunar base construction

Open access
Ellery, Alex·2022·Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Abstract

We explore the limits of in situ resource utilization (ISRU) on the Moon to maximize living off the land by building lunar bases from in situ material. We adopt the philosophy of indigenous peoples who excelled in sustainability. We are interested in leveraging lunar resources to manufacture an entire lunar base in such a fashion that is fully sustainable and minimizes supplies required from Earth. A range of metals, ceramics and volatiles can be extracted from lunar minerals to support construction of a lunar base that include structure, piping and electrical distribution systems. To 3D print a lunar base, we must 3D print the load-bearing structure, electrical distribution system, water-based heating system, drinking water system, air system and orbital transport system from in situ resources. We also address the manufacture of the interior of the lunar base from local resources. The majority of systems constituting a lunar base can be manufactured from in situ resources.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjce-2021-0098

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the Lunar base's interior can still be manufactured from local materials.

    “Despite these challenges, much of the Lunar base's interior can still be manufactured from local materials, ensuring that a significant portion of the infrastructure can be sourced directly from the Moon [121].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Adams, R., et al. 1987. Remote repair demonstration of Solar Maximum main electronics box. Proceedings of the 1st European In-Orbit Operations Technol- ogy Symposium (ESA SP-272). pp. 227-233.
  2. Arslan, Y. 2014. Biomimetic architecture: a new interdisciplinary approach to architecture. Alam Cipta, 7(2): 28-35.
  3. Benaroya, H. 2002. Overview of lunar base structures past and future. In AIAA Space Architecture Symposium, 2002-6113, Houston, Texas. AIAA.
  4. Clark, P., Curtis, S., Minetto, F., and Keller, J. 2007. Finding a dust mitigation strategy that works on the lunar surface. 38th Lunar & Planetary Science Conference, League City, Texas. No. 1338, 1175.
  5. Cong, M., and Shi, H. 2008. Study of magnetic fluid rotary seals for wafer handling robots. In The IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Machine Vision in Practice. pp. 269-273.
  6. Craig, G., Saydam, S., and Dempster, A. 2014. Mining off-Earth minerals: a long-term play? Journal Southern African Institute of Mining & Metallurgy, 114(12): 1039-1047.
  7. Davis, R. 1987. In-orbit and laboratory exchange of ORU's designed/not designed for servicing. In Proceedings of the 1st European In-Orbit Operations Technol- ogy Symposium (ESA SP-272). pp. 123-126.
  8. Ellery, A. 2016. Solar power satellites for clean energy enabled through dis- ruptive technologies. In Proceedings of the 23rd World Energy Congress (Award Winning Papers), Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 133-147.
  9. Ellery, A. 2017. Low-cost space-based geoengineering -a necessary albeit unwelcome solution to climate change. In Proceedings of the IAF Global Space Exploration Conference (GLEX), Beijing, China. GLEX-17-10.
  10. Ellery, A., and Muscatello, A. 2020. Provisioning the naked astronaut with bounty on Mars using robotic self-replicators. Journal of British Interplanetary Society, 73: 409-424.
  11. Ellery, A., Lowing, P., Wanjara, P., Kirby, M., Mellor, I., and Doughty, G. 2017. FFC Cambridge process and metallic 3D printing for deep in-situ resource utilisation -a match made on the Moon. In Proceedings of the Interna- tional Astronautics Congress, Adelaide, Australia. IAC-17-D4.5.4x39364. ESA. 1995. APM human factors engineering requirements. COL-ESA-FM-013: 13-27.
  12. Gracia, V., and Casanova, I. 1998. Sulphur concrete: a viable alternative for lunar construction. In The 6th ASCE Specialty Conference & Exposition on Engineering Construction & Operations in Space. pp. 585-591.
  13. Howe, S., and Wilcox, B. 2016. Outpost assembly using the ATHLETE mobility system. IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana.
  14. Howe, S., Wilcox, B., McQuin, C., Mittman, D., Townsend, J., Polit-Casillas, R., and Litwin, T. 2015. Modular additive construction using native materials. In Proceedings of the 14th Biennial ASCE Aerospace Division International Con- ference on Engineering, Science, Construction and Operations in Challenging Environments. pp. 301-312.
  15. Howe, S., Wilcox, B., Barmatz, M., and Voecks, G. 2016. ATHLETE as a mo- bile ISRU and regolith construction platform. In Proceedings of the ASCE Conference on Engineering, Science, Construction & Operations in Chal- lenging Environments (Earth & Space Conference), Orlando, Fla.
  16. Ishikawa, N., Kanamori, H., and Okada, T. 1992. Possibility of concrete pro- duction on the Moon. In The 2nd Conference on Lunar Bases & Space Activities of the 21st Century. Edited by W. Mendell. pp. 489-497.
  17. Jett, J., Martin, J., Saunders, G., and Stewart, C. 1985. Flow cytometry for health monitoring in space. In Lunar bases & space activities of the 21st Century.
  18. Edited by W. Mendell. Lunar & Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas. pp. 687-695.
  19. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S. 1989. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
  20. Keller, P., and Clemett, S. 2001. Formation of nanophase iron in the lunar rego- lith. In The 32nd Lunar & Planetary Science Conference, abstract no. 2097.
  21. Khoshnevis, B., and Zhang, J. 2012. Extraterrestrial construction using con- tour crafting. In The Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas, Austin, Texas. pp. 250-259.
  22. Kruzelecky, R., Cloutis, E., Hoa, S., Therriault, D., Ellery, A., Xian Jiang, X. 2011. Project MoonDust: characterisation and mitigation of lunar dust. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Environmental Systems. AIAA 2011-5184.
  23. Landis, G., and Jenkins, P. 2002. Dust mitigation for Mars solar arrays. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Photovoltaic Specialists. pp. 812-815.
  24. Lauer, H., and Allton, J. 1992. Mars containers -dust on Teflon sealing surfa- ces. In Space International Conference Space III: Engineering, Construc- tion & Operations in Space. Vol. 1. pp. 508-517.
  25. Lin, T. 1987. Concrete for lunar base construction. In Lunar bases & space activities of the 21st Century. Edited by W. Mendell. pp. 381-396.
  26. Liu, Y., and Taylor, L. 2008. Lunar dust: chemistry and physical properties and implications for toxicity. In NLSI Lunar Science Conference, 2072 abstract.
  27. McKay, D., Davis, H., and Burns, M. 1996. Using fabricators to reduce space transportation costs. In Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Sympo- sium, Austin, Texas. pp. 23-30.
  28. Mendell, W. 1991. Lunar base as a precursor to Mars exploration and settlement. In Proceedings of the International Astronautics Congress, Montreal, Que. IAF-91-704.
  29. Motro, R. 2012. Tensegrity: from art to structural engineering. In Proceedings of the IASS-APCS Symposium, Seoul, South Korea.
  30. Mueller, R., Howe, S., Kochmann, D., Ali, H., Anderson, C., Burgoyne, H., et al. 2016. Automated additive construction (AAC) for Earth and space using in-situ resources. In Proceedings of the 15th Biennial ASCE International Conference on Engineering Science Construction & Operations in Challenging Environ- ments (Earth & Space 2016), Reston, Va.
  31. Parkinson, B., and Wright, P. 2006. Systems modelling and systems trade for a pole station. In Project Boreas: A Station for the Martian Geographic North Pole. Edited by C. Cockell. British Interplanetary Society. pp. 24-31.
  32. Pletka, B. 1993. Processing of lunar basalt materials. In Resources of near- Earth space. Edited by J. Lewis, M. Matthews, and M. Guerrieri. University of Arizona Press. pp. 325-350.
  33. Roedder, E. 1981. Use of lunar materials in space construction. Space Solar Power Review, 2: 249-258.
  34. Sproewitz, A., Billard, A., Dillenbourg, P., and Ijspeert, J. 2009. Roombots - mechanical design of self-reconfiguring modular robots for adaptive fur- niture. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. pp. 4259-4264.
  35. Staehle, R., Burke, J., Dowling, R., and Spudis, P. 1993. Lunar base siting. Space- flight, 35(12): 427-446.
  36. Thiebaut, L., and Cowley, A. 2019. Microwave processing of regolith -a 1D printing cavity for enabling lunar construction technology. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conf Aeronautics & Space Sciences, Paper 917.
  37. Vaniman, D., Petit, D., and Heiken, G. 1992. Uses of lunar sulphur. In The 2nd Con- ference on Lunar Bases & Space Activities of the 21st Century. Vol. 2. pp. 429-435.
  38. Yu, C.-H., Haller, K., Ingber, D., and Nagpal, R. 2008. Morpho: a self-deformable modular robot inspired by cellular structure. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots & Systems. pp. 3571-3578.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ellery, A.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ellery, Alex
Venue
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2022-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
657-674
ISSN
  • 0315-1468 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6029
OpenAlex
W3183792198
Cited by
65
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
Keywords
in-situ resource utilization, lunar base construction, lunar mining, 3D printing, lunar volatiles, sustainable construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review