The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The automation of digital twinning for existing reinforced concrete bridges from point clouds remains an unresolved problem. Whilst current methods can automatically detect bridge objects in point clouds in the form of labelled point clusters, the fitting of accurate 3D shapes to point clusters remains largely human dependent largely. 95% of the total manual modelling time is spent on customizing shapes and fitting them correctly. The challenges exhibited in the fitting step are due to the irregular geometries of existing bridges. Existing methods can fit geometric primitives such as cuboids and cylinders to point clusters, assuming bridges are comprised of generic shapes. However, the produced geometric digital twins are too ideal to depict the real geometry of bridges. In addition, none of the existing methods have explicitly demonstrated how to evaluate the resulting Industry Foundation Classes bridge data models in terms of spatial accuracy using quantitative measurements. In this article, we tackle these challenges by delivering a slicing-based object fitting method that can generate the geometric digital twin of an existing reinforced concrete bridge from four types of labelled point cluster. The quality of the generated models is gauged using cloud-to-cloud distance-based metrics. Experiments on ten bridge point cloud datasets indicate that the method achieves an average modelling distance of 7.05 cm (while the manual method achieves 7.69 cm), and an average modelling time of 37.8 s. This is a huge leap over the current practice of digital twinning performed manually.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient RANSAC for Point‐Cloud Shape Detection
Schnabel, R., Wahl, R., & Klein, R. (2007) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01016.x · Cited by 2,106
Metro: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces
Cignoni, P., Rocchini, C., & Scopigno, R. (1998) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/1467-8659.00236 · Cited by 1,501
Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments
Rusu, R. B., Marton, Z. C., Blodow, N., Dolha, M., & Beetz, M. (2008) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.08.005 · Cited by 1,084
Sacks, R., Eastman, C., Lee, G., & Teicholz, P. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119287568 · Cited by 884
MESH: measuring errors between surfaces using the Hausdorff distance
Aspert, N., Santa-Cruz, D., & Ebrahimi, T. (2003) · Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo · doi:10.1109/icme.2002.1035879 · Cited by 718
Specifying parametric building object behavior (BOB) for a building information modeling system
Lee, G., Sacks, R., & Eastman, C. M. (2005) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2005.09.009 · Cited by 396
Deng, Y., Cheng, J. C. P., & Anumba, C. (2016) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.006 · Cited by 301
Building Information Modeling: Technology Foundations and Industry Practice
(2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92862-3 · Cited by 292
Automatic reconstruction of parametric building models from indoor point clouds
Ochmann, S., Vock, R., Wessel, R., & Klein, R. (2016) · Computers & Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.cag.2015.07.008 · Cited by 275
Parametric 3D modeling in building construction with examples from precast concrete
Sacks, R., Eastman, C. M., & Lee, G. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/s0926-5805(03)00043-8 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications
Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.06.017 · Cited by 1,875
Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review
Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 · Cited by 753
Lim, K. Y. H., Zheng, P., & Chen, C.-H. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-019-01512-w · Cited by 700
A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564 · Cited by 518
Integrating BIM and AI for Smart Construction Management: Current Status and Future Directions
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09830-8 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, R., & Brilakis, I.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 105
- Pages
- 102837
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2944091426
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 23.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837
- The paper
- Lu, R., & Brilakis, I. (2019). Digital twinning of existing reinforced concrete bridges from labelled point clusters. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102837
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.