CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience

Bowman, Caroline H., Evans, Cathryn E.Y., Turnbull, Oliver H.·2005·Brain and Cognition
DOI 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the last decade, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) has become a widely employed neuropsychological research instrument for the investigation of executive function. The task has been employed in a wide range of formats, from 'manual' procedures to more recently introduced computerised versions. Computer-based formats often require that responses on the task should be artificially delayed by a number of seconds between trials to collect skin-conductance data. Participants, however, may become frustrated when they want to select from a particular deck in the time-limited versions--so that an unintended emotional experience of frustration might well disrupt a task presumed to be reliant on emotion-based learning. We investigated the effect of the various types of Iowa Gambling Task format on performance, using three types of task: the classic manual administration, with no time limitations; a computerised administration with a 6-s enforced delay; and a control computerised version which had no time constraints. We also evaluated the subjective experience of participants on each task. There were no significant differences in performance, between formats, in behavioural terms. Subjective experience measures on the task also showed consistent effects across all three formats-with substantial, and rapidly developing, awareness of which decks were 'good' and 'bad.'

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Anderson, 1999, Impairment of social and moral behaviour related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1032, 10.1038/14833 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anderson, 1996, Characterization of the decision-making defect of subjects with ventromedial frontal lobe damage, Society for Neuroscience, 22, 1108
  3. Anderson, 1988, Neuropsychological correlates of bilateral frontal lobe lesions in humans, Society for Neuroscience, 14, 1288
  4. Bechara, 2003, Risky business: Emotion, decision-making, and addiction, Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 23, 10.1023/A:1021223113233 · DOI
  5. Bechara, 1994, Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex, Cognition, 50, 7, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bechara, 1998, Dissociation of working memory from decision-making within the human prefrontal cortex, Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 428, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00428.1998 · DOI
  7. Bechara, 1997, Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy, Science, 275, 1293, 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bechara, 2002, Decision-making and addiction (part II): Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward?, Neuropsychologia, 40, 1690, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00016-7 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bechara, 1996, Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex, Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215, 10.1093/cercor/6.2.215 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Beninger, 2003, Typical and atypical antipsychotic medications differentially affect two nondeclarative memory tasks in schizophrenic patients: A double dissociation, Schizophrenia Research, 61, 281, 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00315-8 · DOI
  11. Blair, 2001, Somatic markers and response reversal: Is there orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in boys with psychopathic tendencies?, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 499, 10.1023/A:1012277125119 · DOI
  12. Bolla, 2003, Orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction in abstinent cocaine abusers performing a decision-making task, NeuroImage, 19, 1085, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00113-7 · DOI
  13. Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (in press). Emotion-based learning on a simplified card task: The Iowa and Bangor Gambling Tasks. Brain and Cognition
  14. Bowman, 2003, Real versus facsimile reinforcers on the Iowa Gambling Task, Brain and Cognition, 53, 207, 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00111-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Crone, 2003, Decision-making in disinhibited adolescents and adults: Insensitivity to future consequences or driven by immediate reward?, Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1
  16. Evans, C. E. Y., Bowman, C. H., & Turnbull, O. H. (under review). Subjective experience and the Iowa Gambling Task: Preserved performance in schizophrenia
  17. Evans, C. E. Y., Kemish, K., & Turnbull, O. H. (in press). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition
  18. North, 2001, Decision making in patients with spinal cord damage: Afferent feedback and the somatic marker hypothesis, Neuropsychologia, 39, 521, 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00107-X · DOI
  19. Schmitt, 1999, Testing Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis with psychopathic individuals: Risk takers or risk averse?, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 3, 538, 10.1037/0021-843X.108.3.538 · DOI
  20. Suzuki, A., Hirota, A., Takasawa, N., & Shigemasu, K. (in press). Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychiatry
  21. Tomb, 2002, Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?, Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1103, 10.1038/nn1102-1103 · DOI
  22. Turnbull, O. H., Evans, C. E. Y., Bunce, A., Carzolio, B., & O’Connor, J. (in press). Central executive resources and the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition
  23. Wilder, 1998, Operant conditioning and the orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenic patients: Unexpected evidence for intact functioning, Schizophrenia Research, 30, 169, 10.1016/S0920-9964(97)00135-7 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 66

Metadata

Authors
Bowman, C. H., Evans, C. E. Y., & Turnbull, O. H.
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-02
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
21-25
ISSN
0278-2626
DOI
10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015
Cited by
66
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015
The paper
Bowman, C. H., Evans, C. E. Y., & Turnbull, O. H. (2005). Artificial time constraints on the Iowa Gambling Task: The effects on behavioural performance and subjective experience. Brain and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.015