Cited by 96Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Xenopus as a model system to study transcriptional regulatory networks

Open access
Koide, Tetsuya, Hayata, Tadayoshi, Cho, Ken W. Y.·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Development is controlled by a complex series of events requiring sequential gene activation. Understanding the logic of gene networks during development is necessary for a complete understanding of how genes contribute to phenotype. Pioneering work initiated in the sea urchin and Drosophila has demonstrated that reasonable transcriptional regulatory network diagrams representing early development in multicellular animals can be generated through use of appropriate genomic, genetic, and biochemical tools. Establishment of similar regulatory network diagrams for vertebrate development is a necessary step. The amphibian Xenopus has long been used as a model for vertebrate early development and has contributed greatly to the elucidation of gene regulation. Because the best and most extensively studied transcriptional regulatory network in Xenopus is that underlying the formation and function of Spemann's organizer, we describe the current status of our understanding of this gene regulatory network and its relationship to mesodermal patterning. Seventy-four transcription factors currently known to be expressed in the mesoendoderm of Xenopus gastrula were characterized according to their modes of action, DNA binding consensus sequences, and target genes. Among them, nineteen transcription factors were characterized sufficiently in detail, allowing us to generate a gene regulatory network diagram. Additionally, we discuss recent amphibian work using a combined DNA microarray and bioinformatics approach that promises to accelerate regulatory network studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0408125102

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Xenopus mesoderm, C. elegans gut/mesoderm, and zebrafish endoderm and mesoderm GRNs also display deep hierarchical organization.

    “GRNs for specification of mesoderm in Xenopus embryos10, for specification of the gut and mesoderm cell lineages in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos11, and for specification of endoderm and dorsal, anterior and ventral gene expression domains12, and of mesoderm13 in zebrafish, also display deep, hierarchical organizations.”

    From Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks (2010) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. [1]Spemann, H. & Mangold, H. (1924) Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. Entwicklungsmech. 100, 599–638. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]Cho, K. W., Blumberg, B., Steinbeisser, H. & De Robertis, E. M. (1991) Cell 67, 1111–1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]Taira, M., Jamrich, M., Good, P. J. & Dawid, I. B. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 356–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [4]Dirksen, M. L. & Jamrich, M. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5]Ruiz i Altaba, A. & Jessell, T. M. (1992) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 116, 81–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6]Lemaire, P., Garrett, N. & Gurdon, J. B. (1995) Cell 81, 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7]Laurent, M. N., Blitz, I. L., Hashimoto, C., Rothbacher, U. & Cho, K. W. (1997) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 124, 4905–4916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8]Blitz, I. L. & Cho, K. W. (1995) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 121, 993–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9]von Dassow, G., Schmidt, J. E. & Kimelman, D. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 355–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10]Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., De Robertis, E. M., Storey, K. G. & Stern, C. D. (1993) Cell 74, 645–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11]Blum, M., Gaunt, S. J., Cho, K. W., Steinbeisser, H., Blumberg, B., Bittner, D. & De Robertis, E. M. (1992) Cell 69, 1097–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12]Stachel, S. E., Grunwald, D. J. & Myers, P. Z. (1993) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 117, 1261–1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13]Gawantka, V., Delius, H., Hirschfeld, K., Blumenstock, C. & Niehrs, C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 6268–6279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14]Onichtchouk, D., Gawantka, V., Dosch, R., Delius, H., Hirschfeld, K., Blumenstock, C. & Niehrs, C. (1996) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 122, 3045–3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15]Smith, J. C., Price, B. M., Green, J. B., Weigel, D. & Herrmann, B. G. (1991) Cell 67, 79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16]Davidson, E. H., McClay, D. R. & Hood, L. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1475–1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [17]Davidson, E. H., Rast, J. P., Oliveri, P., Ransick, A., Calestani, C., Yuh, C. H., Minokawa, T., Amore, G., Hinman, V., Arenas-Mena, C., et al. (2002) Science 295, 1669–1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [18]Davidson, E. H., Rast, J. P., Oliveri, P., Ransick, A., Calestani, C., Yuh, C. H., Minokawa, T., Amore, G., Hinman, V., Arenas-Mena, C., et al. (2002) Dev. Biol. 246, 162–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [19]Loose, M. & Patient, R. (2004) Dev. Biol. 271, 467–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [20]Melton, D. A. (1987) Nature 328, 80–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [21]Kimelman, D. & Kirschner, M. (1987) Cell 51, 869–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [22]Smith, J. C., Price, B. M., Van Nimmen, K. & Huylebroeck, D. (1990) Nature 345, 729–731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. [23]Asashima, M., Nakano, H., Shimada, K., Kinoshita, K., Ishii, K., Shibai, H. & Ueno, N. (1990) Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 198, 330–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. [24]Blumberg, B., Wright, C. V., De Robertis, E. M. & Cho, K. W. (1991) Science 253, 194–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. [25]Kessler, D. S. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13017–13022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. [26]Sadowski, I., Ma, J., Triezenberg, S. & Ptashne, M. (1988) Nature 335, 563–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. [27]Jaynes, J. B. & O'Farrell, P. H. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1427–1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. [28]Kolm, P. J. & Sive, H. L. (1995) Dev. Biol. 171, 267–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. [29]Gammill, L. S. & Sive, H. (1997) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 124, 471–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. [30]Tada, M., Casey, E. S., Fairclough, L. & Smith, J. C. (1998) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 125, 3997–4006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. [31]Saka, Y., Tada, M. & Smith, J. C. (2000) Mech. Dev. 93, 27–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. [32]Watanabe, M. & Whitman, M. (1999) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 126, 5621–5634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. [33]Hayata, T., Tanegashima, K., Takahashi, S., Sogame, A. & Asashima, M. (2002) Mech. Dev. 112, 37–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. [34]Hyde, C. E. & Old, R. W. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 1221–1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. [35]Clements, D. & Woodland, H. R. (2003) Dev. Biol. 258, 454–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. [36]Hilton, E., Rex, M. & Old, R. (2003) Mech. Dev. 120, 1127–1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. [37]White, R. J., Sun, B. I., Sive, H. L. & Smith, J. C. (2002) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 129, 4867–4876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. [38]Watabe, T., Kim, S., Candia, A., Rothbacher, U., Hashimoto, C., Inoue, K. & Cho, K. W. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 3038–3050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. [39]Ring, C., Ogata, S., Meek, L., Song, J., Ohta, T., Miyazono, K. & Cho, K. W. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 820–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. [40]Artinger, M., Blitz, I., Inoue, K., Tran, U. & Cho, K. W. (1997) Mech. Dev. 65, 187–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. [41]Latinkic, B. V., Umbhauer, M., Neal, K. A., Lerchner, W., Smith, J. C. & Cunliffe, V. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3265–3276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. [42]Re'em-Kalma, Y., Lamb, T. & Frank, D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12141–12145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. [43]Vonica, A. & Gumbiner, B. M. (2002) Dev. Biol. 250, 112–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. [44]Danilov, V., Blum, M., Schweickert, A., Campione, M. & Steinbeisser, H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 627–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. [45]Germain, S., Howell, M., Esslemont, G. M. & Hill, C. S. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 435–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. [46]Latinkic, B. V. & Smith, J. C. (1999) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 126, 1769–1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. [47]Yao, J. & Kessler, D. S. (2001) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 128, 2975–2987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. [48]Brickman, J. M., Jones, C. M., Clements, M., Smith, J. C. & Beddington, R. S. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 2303–2315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. [49]Casey, E. S., O'Reilly, M. A., Conlon, F. L. & Smith, J. C. (1998) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 125, 3887–3894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. [50]Tada, M. & Smith, J. C. (2000) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 127, 2227–2238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. [51]Casey, E. S., Tada, M., Fairclough, L., Wylie, C. C., Heasman, J. & Smith, J. C. (1999) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 126, 4193–4200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. [52]Trindade, M., Tada, M. & Smith, J. C. (1999) Dev. Biol. 216, 442–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. [53]Hopwood, N. D., Pluck, A. & Gurdon, J. B. (1991) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 111, 551–560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. [54]Polli, M. & Amaya, E. (2002) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 129, 2917–2927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. [55]Shin, Y., Kitayama, A., Koide, T., Peiffer, D. A., Mochii, M., Liao, M., Ueno, N. & Cho, K. W. (2005) Dev. Dyn. 232, 432–444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. [56]Peiffer, D. A., Von Bubnoff, A., Shin, Y., Kitayama, A., Mochii, M., Ueno, N., Cho, K. W. (2005) Dev. Dyn. 232, 445–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. [57]Kroll, K. L. & Amaya, E. (1996) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 122, 3173–3183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. [58]Zhang, J. & King, M. L. (1996) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 122, 4119–4129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. [59]Zhang, J., Houston, D. W., King, M. L., Payne, C., Wylie, C. & Heasman, J. (1998) Cell 94, 515–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. [60]Taverner, N. V., Kofron, M., Shin, Y., Kabitschke, C., Gilchrist, M. J., Wylie, C., Cho, K. W., Heasman, J. & Smith, J. C. (2005) Mech. Dev. 122, 333–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. [61]Conlon, F. L., Fairclough, L., Price, B. M., Casey, E. S. & Smith, J. C. (2001) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 128, 3749–3758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. [62]Markstein, M., Markstein, P., Markstein, V. & Levine, M. S. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 763–768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. [63]Markstein, M., Zinzen, R., Markstein, P., Yee, K. P., Erives, A., Stathopoulos, A. & Levine, M. (2004) Development (Cambridge, U.K.) 131, 2387–2394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. [64]Loots, G. G., Ovcharenko, I., Pachter, L., Dubchak, I. & Rubin, E. M. (2002) Genome Res. 12, 832–839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. [65]Jegga, A. G., Sherwood, S. P., Carman, J. W., Pinski, A. T., Phillips, J. L., Pestian, J. P. & Aronow, B. J. (2002) Genome. Res. 12, 1408–1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. [66]Nobrega, M. A., Zhu, Y., Plajzer-Frick, I., Afzal, V. & Rubin, E. M. (2004) Nature 431, 988–993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. [67]Karaulanov, E., Knochel, W. & Niehrs, C. (2004) EMBO J. 23, 844–856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. [68]von Bubnoff, A., Peiffer, D. A., Blitz, I. L., Hayata, T., Ogata, S., Zeng, Q., Trunnell, M. & Cho, K. W. Y., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  69. [69]Ren, B., Cam, H., Takahashi, Y., Volkert, T., Terragni, J., Young, R. A. & Dynlacht, B. D. (2002) Genes Dev. 16, 245–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. [70]Odom, D. T., Zizlsperger, N., Gordon, D. B., Bell, G. W., Rinaldi, N. J., Murray, H. L., Volkert, T. L., Schreiber, J., Rolfe, P. A., Gifford, D. K., et al. (2004) Science 303, 1378–1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. [71]Li, Z., Van Calcar, S., Qu, C., Cavenee, W. K., Zhang, M. Q. & Ren, B. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8164–8169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koide, T., Hayata, T., & Cho, K. W. Y.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-03-28
Volume
102
Issue
14
Pages
4943-4948
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2095008230
Cited by
96
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-29507, R01HD029507)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
Xenopus, transcriptional regulatory networks, Spemann's organizer, transcription factors, target genes, DNA microarrays, bioinformatics
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Endoderm, Genes, Regulator, Mesoderm, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Xenopus, Signal Transduction, Transcriptional Activation, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Genomics, Xenopus Proteins, Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review