Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Matrix metalloproteinases: What do they not do? New substrates and biological roles identified by murine models and proteomics

Open access
Rodríguez, David, Morrison, Charlotte J., Overall, Christopher M.·2010·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research

Abstract

The biological roles of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been traditionally associated with the degradation and turnover of most of the components of the extracellular matrix (ECM). This functional misconception has been used for years to explain the involvement of the MMP family in developmental processes, cell homeostasis and disease, and led to clinical trials of MMP inhibitors for the treatment of cancer that failed to meet their endpoints and cast a shadow on MMPs as druggable targets. Accumulated evidence from a great variety of post-trial MMP degradomics studies, ranging from transgenic models to recent state-of-the-art proteomics screens, is changing the dogma about MMP functions. MMPs regulate cell behavior through finely tuned and tightly controlled proteolytic processing of a large variety of signaling molecules that can also have beneficial effects in disease resolution. Moreover, net proteolytic activity relies upon direct interactions between the different protease and protease inhibitor families, interconnected in a complex protease web, with MMPs acting as key nodal components. Such complexity renders simple interpretation of Mmp knockout mice very difficult. Indeed, the phenotype of these models reveals the response of a complex system to the loss of one protease rather than necessarily a direct effect of the lack of functional activity of a protease. Such a shift in the MMP functional paradigm, together with the difficulties associated with current methods of studying proteases this highlights the need for new high content degradomics approaches to uncover and annotate MMP activities in vivo and identify novel interactions within the protease web. Integration of these techniques with specifically designed animal models for final validation should lay the foundations for the development of new inhibitors that specifically target disease-related MMPs and/or their upstream effectors that cause deleterious effects in disease, while sparing MMP functions that are protective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.09.015

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 223 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Rodríguez, D., Morrison, C. J., & Overall, C. M.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
1803
Issue
1
Pages
39-54
ISSN
0167-4889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004540849
Cited by
560
References
223
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matrix metalloproteinases: What do they not do? New substrates and biological roles identified by murine models and proteomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.09.015
The paper
Rodríguez, D., Morrison, C. J., & Overall, C. M. (2010). Matrix metalloproteinases: What do they not do? New substrates and biological roles identified by murine models and proteomics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.09.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.