Cited by 2,761Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsTGF-β signaling in diseasesPeptidase Inhibition and Analysis

Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors and Cancer—Trials and Tribulations

Coussens, Lisa M., Fingleton, Barbara, Matrisian, Lynn M.·2002·Science

Abstract

For at least 30 years, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have been heralded as promising targets for cancer therapy on the basis of their massive up-regulation in malignant tissues and their unique ability to degrade all components of the extracellular matrix. Preclinical studies testing the efficacy of MMP suppression in tumor models were so compelling that synthetic metalloproteinase inhibitors (MPIs) were rapidly developed and routed into human clinical trials. The results of these trials have been disappointing. Here we review the studies that brought MPIs into clinical testing and discuss the design and outcome of the trials in light of new information about the cellular source, substrates, and mode of action of MMPs at different stages of tumor progression. The important lessons learned from the MPI experience may be of great value for future studies of MPIs and for cancer drug development in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1067100

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trials with MMP inhibitors have had mixed results, with efficacy reported mostly during early tumour progression.

    “Given their diverse actions, it is also not surprising that trials with MMP inhibitors have had mixed results, with efficacy reported mostly during early tumour progression66.”

    From Inflammation and cancer (2002) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coussens, L. M., Fingleton, B., & Matrisian, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Matrisian, Lynn M.
Venue
Science
Published
2002-03-29
Volume
295
Issue
5564
Pages
2387-2392
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1984483611
Cited by
2,761
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 116 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 135 · 2014: 125 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 152
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50-CA90949, R01 CA 84360, P30 CA 68485, CA72006, P01CA072006, R01CA060867, R01CA60867, R01CA084360, P50CA090949, P30CA068485)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
Keywords
matrix metalloproteinases, metalloproteinase inhibitors, cancer therapy, clinical trials, extracellular matrix degradation, tumor progression, anticancer drug development, preclinical to clinical translation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Protease Inhibitors, Disease Progression, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review