Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender and age differences in psychomotor vigilance performance under differential sleep pressure conditions

Blatter, Katharina, Graw, Peter, Münch, Mirjam, Knoblauch, Vera, Wirz-Justice, Anna, Cajochen, Christian·2006·Behavioural Brain Research
DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Adam, 1999, Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies, Ergonomics, 42, 327, 10.1080/001401399185685 · DOI
  2. Adam M, Rétey JV, Khatami R, Landolt, HP. Age-related changes in the time course of vigilant attention during 40h without sleep in men. Sleep, in press.
  3. Bellis, 1933, Reaction time and chronological age, Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 30, 801, 10.3181/00379727-30-6682 · DOI
  4. Bonnet, 1989, The effect of sleep fragmentation on sleep and performance in younger and older subjects, Neurobiol Aging, 10, 21, 10.1016/S0197-4580(89)80006-5 · DOI
  5. Bonnet, 1989, Sleep loss in aging, Clin Geriatr Med, 5, 405, 10.1016/S0749-0690(18)30687-6 · DOI
  6. Botwinick, 1966, Components of reaction time in relation to age and sex, J Genet Psychol, 108, 175, 10.1080/00221325.1966.10532776 · DOI
  7. Brendel, 1990, Sleep stage physiology, mood, and vigilance responses to total sleep deprivation in healthy 80-year-olds and 20-year-olds, Psychophysiology, 27, 677, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb03193.x · DOI
  8. Cajochen, 2004, Circadian and sleep–wake dependent impact on neurobehavioral function, Psychol Belg, 44, 59, 10.5334/pb.1017 · DOI
  9. Cajochen, 2001, Dynamics of frontal EEG activity, sleepiness and body temperature under high and low sleep pressure, Neuroreport, 12, 2277, 10.1097/00001756-200107200-00046 · DOI
  10. Dinges, 1997, Cumulative sleepiness, mood disturbance, and psychomotor vigilance performance decrements during a week of sleep restricted to 4–5h per night, Sleep, 20, 267
  11. Dinges, 1985, Microcomputer analyses of performance on a portable, simple visual RT task during sustained operations, Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 17, 625, 10.3758/BF03200977 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Doran, 2001, Sustained attention performance during sleep deprivation: evidence of state instability, Arch Ital Biol, 139, 253
  13. Graw, 2004, Circadian and wake-dependent modulation of fastest and slowest reaction times during the psychomotor vigilance task, Physiol Behav, 80, 695, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.12.004 · DOI
  14. Jevas, 2001, The effect of aging on cognitive function: a preliminary quantitative review, Res Q Exerc Sport, 72, A-49
  15. Mackworth, 1948, The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search, Q J Exp Psychol, 1, 6, 10.1080/17470214808416738 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Monk, 2000, Circadian rhythms in healthy aging—effects downstream from the pacemaker, Chronobiol Int, 17, 355, 10.1081/CBI-100101051 · DOI
  17. Münch, 2004, The frontal predominance of human EEG delta activity after sleep loss decreases with age, Eur J Neurosci, 20, 1402, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03580.x · DOI
  18. Münch, 2005, Age-related attenuation of the evening circadian arousal signal in humans, Neurobiol Aging, 26, 1307, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.03.004 · DOI
  19. Noble, 1964, Age and sex parameters and psychomotor learning, Percept Mot Skills, 19, 935, 10.2466/pms.1964.19.3.935 · DOI
  20. Parasuraman, 1989, Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults, Psychol Aging, 4, 339, 10.1037/0882-7974.4.3.339 · DOI
  21. Philip, 1999, Simple reaction time, duration of driving and sleep deprivation in young versus old automobile drivers, J Sleep Res, 8, 9, 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1999.00127.x · DOI
  22. Philip, 2004, Age, performance and sleep deprivation, J Sleep Res, 13, 105, 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00399.x · DOI
  23. Robbins, 1998, A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery, J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 4, 474, 10.1017/S1355617798455073 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Smulders, 1997, The effects of sleep loss on task performance and the electroencephalogram in young and elderly subjects, Biol Psychol, 45, 217, 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05229-5 · DOI
  25. Wyatt, 1997, Interaction of circadian- and sleep/wake homeostatic-processes modulate psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) performance, Sleep Res, 26, 759

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Blatter, K., Graw, P., Münch, M., Knoblauch, V., Wirz-Justice, A., & Cajochen, C.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
168
Issue
2
Pages
312-317
ISSN
0166-4328
DOI
10.1016/j.bbr.2005.11.018
Cited by
180
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.